CVS for FL (AG)

[Ivan R. Judson]

The confusion I think Bob is having (I'm guessing here since his mail
was so short :-), and I have is:

Are you talking about creating an AG module in the CVS repository, with
submodules under AG?

Are you talking about modifying Voyager to be group futures writeable?

Are these good ideas?  It seems like a bad idea to make things more
widely writeable than less.  We can always widen it later, history shows
narrowing just isn't allowed.  Look at the fl-core mailing list.

Can you explain more clearly the relationship between CVS, AG and
Voyager? It's entirely confusing to me.

And are you talking about a AGProto repository or an AG repository (ie,
is this for 1.0 to go into, or for current 2.0 stuff)?  The reason I ask
is there is more that needs to be considered for 2.0, I believe, based
on discussions I've had with Mike.

--Ivan

..........
Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
Futures Laboratory .~.  630 252 0920
Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Justin Binns
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: systems at mcs.anl.gov
> Cc: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: CVS for FL (AG)
> 
> 
> The public anonymous CVS for the AG stuff is becoming an even 
> higher priority.  Last time this came up, there were some 
> questions - now I've got answers.  We'd like to modify the 
> CVS repository that currently houses voyager, add the ability 
> for us to add other modules to it (for AG stuff), keep the 
> anonymous pserver stuff, and set it up so group 'futures' can 
> do commits.  The sooner this can work, the better.  If there 
> is more info that is required, let me know.  Thanks!
> 
> Justin
>