CVS stuff for AG

[Robert Olson]

I'm not sure why you don't like ag-cvs.mcs but cvs.mcs is okay?

At 10:37 AM 10/24/2002 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:

>I don't care if we have ag-cvs, I'd prefer we not advertise it, but
>that's a personal preference. I'd definitely like the cname
>cvs.mcs.anl.gov to point to where ever the divisional cvs server is, can
>we make that happen?
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Ivan
>
>..........
>Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
>Futures Laboratory .~.  630 252 0920
>Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Binns [mailto:binns at mcs.anl.gov]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:27 AM
> > To: Robert Olson
> > Cc: judson at mcs.anl.gov; papka at mcs.anl.gov; 'Ag-Dev at Mcs. Anl. Gov'
> > Subject: RE: CVS stuff for AG
> >
> >
> > It's becoming a well-defined divisional cvs server, though
> > the actual machine on which it lives will probably change
> > before it gets too much wide use.  The nice thing about
> > cnames is we can always add more, and if we have a cname of
> > 'ag-cvs' that gets well known, and we do decide to rehost the
> > AG modules somewhere else (for whatever reason) we have an
> > easier time changing it without affecting our user community.
> >  Or, that's my take.  But if we want to change it to
> > 'cvs.mcs.anl.gov' (or add that cname, additionally) I'm sure
> > we can make it happen.
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Robert Olson wrote:
> >
> > > ah, if it's a well-defined divisional cvs server cvs.mcs
> > makes sense.
> > >
> > > At 08:51 AM 10/24/2002 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> > >
> > > >This looks good. I'm wary of the cname stuff a bit, after
> > all this is
> > > >the division wide anonymous cvs server, perhaps we should just
> > > >publish cvs.mcs.anl.gov as the host, module AG. (Which
> > feels better
> > > >when I consider Voyager would be at the same host, just module
> > > >voyager -- it feels cleaner somehow).
> > > >
> > > >Not a big deal; UCL changed the host for their cvs every
> > few months
> > > >and you had to look it up on the web page -- not ideal, but it
> > > >worked.
> > > >
> > > >--Ivan
> > > >
> > > >..........
> > > >Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
> > > >Futures Laboratory .~.  630 252 0920
> > > >Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Justin Binns [mailto:binns at mcs.anl.gov]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:39 AM
> > > > > To: Ivan R. Judson
> > > > > Cc: 'Robert Olson'; papka at mcs.anl.gov; 'Ag-Dev at Mcs. Anl. Gov'
> > > > > Subject: RE: CVS stuff for AG
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I've made a few changes, along the lines below...
> > > > >
> > > > > The machine has a cname of ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov
> > > > >
> > > > > The repository is soft-linked to '/cvsroot', and only that
> > > > > softlink is acceptible for pserver
> > > > >
> > > > > The module for the source is, as Ivan suggestes, 'AG'
> > with a tag
> > > > > of AG_<major>_<minor> for the version (currently, just
> > one, AG_1_2
> > > > > for AG 1.2).
> > > > >
> > > > > To summarize:
> > > > >
> > > > > The pserver (read-only) access to the repository is
> > available by
> > > > > the following command:
> > > > >
> > > > > cvs -d :pserver:anonymous at ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov:/cvsroot
> > co <module>
> > > > >
> > > > > The modules are:
> > > > >
> > > > > 'AG'      AG source code.  Tagged revision 'AG_1_2' has
> > the 1.2 source
> > > > > 'ag-dep'  AG dependency tarballs - ag-linux-dep.tgz and
> > > > > ag-windows-dep.tgz 'ag-vic'  UCL VIC with all patches
> > and such, as
> > > > > currently distributed with
> > > > >         the AG binary distributions
> > > > >
> > > > > Any other thoughts/suggestions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > is it going to stay in a sandbox directory? maybe also
> > > > > > > advertise via a cname - ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov or something.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know what you mean by sandbox, but the plan is to use
> > > > > > pachelbel.mcs.anl.gov and enable anonymous cvs on the AG
> > > > > > modules.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > are there notes on local access? can we restrict anonymous
> > > > > > > access from certain modules, or are we going to be able to
> > > > > > > just make it all accessible
> > > > > > > (my vote...).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We'll be making it all accessible, but there will be a
> > > > > review process
> > > > > > for code that is being proposed to be committed.
> > We'll have to
> > > > > > be extremely careful about not putting broken stuff
> > in -- this
> > > > > > process allows external developers and internal developers to
> > > > > > submit modifications/additions in a symmetric way,
> > which is good
> > > > > > for community vibe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I worry a bit about the ag-src name - that's the
> > source of one
> > > > > > > version of ag software, but as we add more it might
> > not make
> > > > > > > sense (hence the name I
> > > > > > > used for the SF module).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think the module name should be AG, 1.0 should be
> > put in with
> > > > > > the 1.0 tag, and when we're ready we'll make a 2.0
> > branch (then
> > > > > we can do
> > > > > > bug fixes to 1.0 and still move ahead on 2.0).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that makes sense, but I was up til 3:30 with
> > > > > Isaiah, you never
> > > > > > know :-) --Ivan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > --bob
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At 01:16 PM 10/21/2002 -0500, Michael E. Papka wrote:
> > > > > > > >The future distribution of AG software will be via
> > > > > anonymous cvs at
> > > > > > > >ANL, we are moving off the sourceforge site (discussed
> > > > > many times no
> > > > > > > >need to be rediscussed here). Justin and Tom have tested
> > > > > this and we
> > > > > > > >think its ready to go, Ivan will be sending mail to ag-tech
> > > > > > > announcing
> > > > > > > >this, along with directions. Justin and Ivan turn these
> > > > > > > >instructions into a web page that can be put on
> > the AG site.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Mike
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >From: Justin Binns [mailto:binns at mcs.anl.gov]
> > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 4:50 PM
> > > > > > > >To: Michael E. Papka
> > > > > > > >Subject: CVS stuff for AG
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The CVS_ROOT is:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >:pserver:anonymous at pachelbel.mcs.anl.gov:/sandbox/cvs
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The password is blank.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >The relevant modules are:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >ag-src - the AG java sources and the helper apps.  This
> > > > > is what was
> > > > > > > >'agib-1-glue' in the sourceforge repository.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >ag-dep - this contains two tarballs that have the linux
> > > > > and windows
> > > > > > > >dependencies for building AG stuff.  notably, the
> > > > > > > ag-linux-dep tarball
> > > > > > > >contains an entire tree suitable for building
> > ag-src - with
> > > > > > > >that tarball and the ag-src module, you can build
> > the ag jar
> > > > > > > >file
> > > > > > > and helper
> > > > > > > >apps from scratch.  NOTE: this also contains the source
> > > > > > > distribution of
> > > > > > > >the Orbacus stuff, for license compliance (at
> > least on *some*
> > > > > > > >level)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >ag-vic - the AG 'patched' version of UCL vic - a
> > copy of the
> > > > > > > 'ag-vic'
> > > > > > > >module in the sourceforge CVS repo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >One note: the reason the dependencies are dealt with as
> > > > > tarballs is
> > > > > > > >that CVS, for some undetermined reason, was corrupting
> > > > > > > certain of the
> > > > > > > >.jar files when I tried to directly check in the
> > tree.  If we
> > > > > > > >can figure out why, then we can probably make it
> > cleaner and
> > > > > > > distribute the
> > > > > > > >dependencies as fully expanded modules instead of
> > tarballs,
> > > > > > > >but this method works whereas the other is
> > currently broken.
> > > > > > > >As these dependencies are not likely to change
> > much, and are
> > > > > > > basically binaries,
> > > > > > > >I didn't think it was a big deal to do it this way.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Questions/comments welcome.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Justin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >