[petsc-users] petsc and slepc incompatibility

[Dominic Steinitz]

Hi Karli,

Many thanks for the very swift reply :-) I did indeed look there and it says

> Stay tuned via the mailing list
Which is why I subscribed to the slepc mailing list but perhaps it meant 
*this* mailing list rather than the slepc mailing list?

I can build 3.7 :-) I have just checked out the tag marked 3.6.3 and am 
trying to build that. I will report back soon.

Once again thanks for responding

Dominic.

On 08/05/2016 09:19, Karl Rupp wrote:
> Dear Dominic,
>
> have a look here:
> http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2016-April/029224.html
>
> Best regards,
> Karli
>
>
>
> On 05/08/2016 10:15 AM, Dominic Steinitz wrote:
>> Hi Hong,
>>
>> I too am having compatibility issues. I looked at the git repos.
>>
>>>   v3.7                       PETSc 3.7
>>>   v3.6.4                    PETSc 3.6.4
>>>   v3.6.3                    PETSc 3.6.3
>>>   v3.6.2                    PETSc 3.6.2
>>>   v3.6.1                    PETSc 3.6.1
>> and
>>
>>>   v3.6.3                    SLEPc 3.6.3
>>>   v3.6.2                    SLEPc 3.6.2
>>>   v3.6.1                    SLEPc 3.6.1
>> If I just checkout master on both repos, won't I get PETSc 3.7 and SLEPc
>> 3.6.3?
>>
>> Should I checkout the tag for 3.6.3 on the PETSc repo?
>>
>> Many thanks, Dominic
>>
>> BTW I checked https://listas.upv.es/pipermail/slepc-announce/ for
>> announcements on new versions but nothing has been posted since June 
>> 2015.
>>
>>> Marco:
>>> You may use petsc-master and slepc-master.
>>> Hong
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>> >
>>> >   first, let me congratulate and thank the PETSc team and all
>>> > contributors for release 3.7 .
>>> >
>>> > I just noticed that the changes in Options handling introduced in 3.7
>>> > broke the build of the latest SLEPc (3.6.1, since 3.6.3 is flagged as
>>> > incompatible with 3.7).
>>> >
>>> > Is there already a time estimate for a compatible release of SLEPc ?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you and kind regards,
>>> >
>>> > Marco Zocca
>>> >
>