[Nek5000-users] wavelet decomposition
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Tue Oct 31 07:07:52 CDT 2017
Hi Hesam,
I've not looked in detail at this paper, but my guess is that you're trying to do some convolution sums. (How many?)
One option is just to do them. For n points, the cost for each
is O(n).
Another option (perhaps), is to map all your data onto a uniform
grid and use an FFT-based convolution (provided your method
can be written this way, as I've seen in at least one paper on the
topic). Here, a parallel FFT might be of value (but there might be
other ways as well).
hth,
Paul
________________________________
From: Nek5000-users <nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 2:34:02 PM
To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Subject: [Nek5000-users] wavelet decomposition
Dear all,
I would like to perform a wavelet decomposition on my DNS data of stratified turbulence generated using Nek5000. The details of the decomposition to extract coherent vorticies is explained in this paper:
Farge, M., Schneider, K., Pellegrino, G., Wray, A. A., & Rogallo, R. S. (2003). Coherent vortex extraction in three-dimensional homogeneous turbulence: Comparison between CVS-wavelet and POD-Fourier decompositions. Physics of Fluids, 15(10), 2886-2896.
I am wondering if anyone in our community has had any experience with integrating the wavelet analysis with Nek5000 in the post-processing mode?
If not, would you suggest performing such a decomposition in the VisIt Python Interface using a python package like PyWavelets for example?
Thanks a lot for the help,
Regards,
Hesam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20171031/12fe486b/attachment.html>
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list