[petsc-users] PLEX depth stratum bug ?

[Jed Brown]

Dharmendar Reddy <dharmareddy84 at gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, depth is depth in the DAG, not topological dimension.

I still think this is confusing, especially when working with
interpolated and non-interpolated meshes.  I could be wrong, but I don't
think the generic code would be messier written in terms of topological
dimension (and co-dimension) and I think it would be vastly easier to
explain.

Who can remember height vs depth anyway?

> Ok, I had a misunderstanding then. So, to be safe,  I should use depth
> 0 to access nodes and height 0 to access dim-cells.

Yes.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20140127/47bff866/attachment.pgp>