[petsc-users] -no_signal_handler flag

[Matthew Knepley]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, <Wadud.Miah at awe.co.uk> wrote:

> ******
>
> Hello,****
>
> ** **
>
> Would it be possible to build PETSc so that the flag -no_signal_handler
> does not have to specified at run time? Or is there a PETSc subroutine that
> can be called to implement the -no_signal_handler feature?
>

http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Sys/PetscPopSignalHandler.html

   Matt


>
>
> Many thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> *--------------------------*****
>
> *Wadud Miah*
> *HPC, Design and Theoretical Physics**
> *Direct: 0118 98 56220
> AWE, Aldermaston, ****Reading**, ** RG7 4PR********
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> ___________________________________________________
> ____________________________ The information in this email and in any
> attachment(s) is commercial in confidence. If you are not the named
> addressee(s) or if you receive this email in error then any distribution,
> copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
> prohibited. Please notify us immediately by email at admin.internet(at)
> awe.co.uk, and then delete this message from your computer. While
> attachments are virus checked, AWE plc does not accept any liability in
> respect of any virus which is not detected. AWE Plc Registered in England
> and Wales Registration No 02763902 AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130815/0ca495ac/attachment.html>