[petsc-users] -no_signal_handler flag

Wadud.Miah at awe.co.uk Wadud.Miah at awe.co.uk
Thu Aug 15 04:31:35 CDT 2013


Hello,

Would it be possible to build PETSc so that the flag -no_signal_handler does not have to specified at run time? Or is there a PETSc subroutine that can be called to implement the -no_signal_handler feature?

Many thanks,

--------------------------
Wadud Miah
HPC, Design and Theoretical Physics
Direct: 0118 98 56220
AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR




___________________________________________________
____________________________

The information in this email and in any attachment(s) is 
commercial in confidence. If you are not the named addressee(s) 
or 
if you receive this email in error then any distribution, copying or 
use of this communication or the information in it is strictly 
prohibited. Please notify us immediately by email at 
admin.internet(at)awe.co.uk, and then delete this message from 
your computer. While attachments are virus checked, AWE plc 
does not accept any liability in respect of any virus which is not 
detected.

AWE Plc
Registered in England and Wales
Registration No 02763902
AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130815/b88a0965/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list