[PETSC #16590] PETSc on Dual Opteron Cluster

amjad ali amjad11 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 09:50:33 CDT 2007


Hello Matt...

1) configure.log attached

2) Yes, I am online.

3) At the moment I want to develop & run PARALLEL codes on my FC6 Desktop
(single machine). Should I use the option --download-mpich=1 or
--download-mpich=0

regards,
Amjad Ali.

On 9/4/07, Matthew Knepley <petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> 1) Always send configure.log
>
> 2) It appears that you cannot reach the PETSc ftp site. Are you online?
>
>    Matt
>
> On 9/4/07, amjad ali <amjad11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all in PETSc team and others,
> >
> > I tried to install/configure PETSc 2.3.3-p5 on my FC6 desktop computer.
> > Following Happend:
> >
> > [petsc1 at localhost petsc-2.3.3-p5]$ ./config/configure.py --with-cc=gcc
> > --with-fc=gfortran --with-cxx=g++ --download-f-blas-lapack=1
> > --download-mpich=1 --with-scalar-type=complex --with-clanguage=cxx
> >
> =================================================================================
> >              Configuring PETSc to compile on your system
> >
> >
> =================================================================================
> > TESTING: configureLibrary from
> > config.packages.BlasLapack
> (python/BuildSystem/con*********************************************************************************
> >          UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.logfor
> > details):
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Error downloading fblaslapack.tar.gz requested with -with-f-blas-lapack
> > option
> >
> *********************************************************************************
> >
> > How to tackle this situation?
> >
> > At the moment I want to develop & run PARALLEL codes on my FC6 Desktop
> > (single machine). Should I use the option --download-mpich=1 or
> > --download-mpich=0
> >
> > Regards to All.
> > Amjad Ali.
> >
> > On 9/4/07, Matthew Knepley <petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > > On 9/4/07, amjad ali <amjad11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello Satish, hoping you will be fine and happy.
> > > >
> > > > Is it necessary to have MPICH2 already installed (seaprately),
> before
> > > > installing/configuring PETSc.
> > >
> > > If this is Windows, yes it is necessary (if you want to run in
> > > parallel). If not,
> > > you can use --with-mpi=0.
> > >
> > > > Do we need at all MPICH2 separately to wprk with PETSc or installing
> > PETSc
> > > > will automatically have MPI implementation within that?
> > >
> > > PETSc can automatically build MPI, but not on Windows unfortunately.
> > >
> > >   Thanks,
> > >
> > >      Matt
> > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Amjad Ali.
> > > >
> > > > Also please answer my Yesterday's question:
> > > >
> > > > What is your opinion about using PETSc for developing/running
> > appliactions
> > > > on MS Windows (Compute Cluster server) based cluster?
> > > >
> > > > Is it better/equal to Linux based system in performance?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Amjad Ali.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/21/07, amjad ali <amjad11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Satish,
> > > > > Thanks a lot for your kind answers. These are definitely helpful
> in
> > > > clearifying concepts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Amjad Ali
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8/21/07, Satish Balay <petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov > wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, amjad ali wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > Thanks Balay for your kind reply.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As my system is:
> > > > > > > Total cpu cores =4x4 = 16.  And there are 2 memory banks per
> node,
> > so
> > > > total
> > > > > > > = 8 memory banks for the complete cluster.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let me ask my question in a better way:
> > > > > > > *Is this system is suffiently good (giving decent performance)
> to
> > RUN
> > > > > > > my "PETSc based Parallel CFD/FEM code" on this system *?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it should be fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you please suggest any other *BETTER* PC-cluster for my
> PETSc
> > > > code?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Inte Core Duos appear to have much higher mermory bandwidth - so
> > they
> > > > > > can potentially do better [this is unverified/speculation. Also
> the
> > > > > > latencies are higher - so I'm not sure if this hurts performance
> > > > > > much].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also - we recommend doing the development on machines where
> its
> > easy
> > > > > > > > to run debuggers [your desktop or laptop etc..] - and not a
> > parallel
> > > > > > > > machine - where such things are hard to do.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How to install and use PETSc on desktop (single machine)? Is
> it
> > > > straight
> > > > > > > forward?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes [assuming your desktop is linux] its straight forward. Just
> use
> > > > > > the configure option --download-mpich=1. You'll be able to run
> > > > > > parallel codes on this machine [by default MPICH will use
> multiple
> > > > > > processes for the parallel run, and all these processes will run
> on
> > > > > > your desktop].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When developing code - performance is not critical, so the above
> > model
> > > > > > will be more convinent than developing on a cluster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Satish
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> > > their experiments lead.
> > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20070904/92d6b1e0/attachment.htm>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list