Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10

Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D jagruti.trivedi at navy.mil
Tue Oct 9 17:45:26 CDT 2007


 
Hello Licendro,

Here is the first question after the installation of petsc-2.3.3-p6.

I ran:
Config/config.py --with-cc=gcc --with-fc=g77 --download-f-blas-lapack=1 --download-mpich=1

/usr/local/bin/make all test /* run gnu make

I get the following status error:

Running test examples to verify correct installation
c/C++ example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully with 1 MPI process

c/C++ example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully with 2 MPI process

Graphics example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully with 1 MPI process

/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
Fortran example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex5f run successfully with 1 MPI process
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
/bin/sh: test: argument expected
 make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored)
Completed test examples

Is this the correct installation? Why am I getting this error messages?

Thanks,

....Jagruti

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Lisandro Dalcin
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:31
To: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10

I want to suggest you to update to 2.3.3. Of course, you have the extra trouble of figuring out yourself the cummulative changes since 2.2.1.

Go ahead updating to 2.3.3, and I can help you at any point you have trouble.



On 10/9/07, Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D <jagruti.trivedi at navy.mil> wrote:
>
> Do you mean that I should apply changes from 2.2.1 to 2.3.0 and then
> 2.3.1 and so forth until I come upto 2.3.3 version or I can apply 
> directly from 2.2.1 to 2.3.3?
>
> ...Jagruti
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Satish Balay
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:29
> To: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10
>
>
> It is possible that we didn't document all the changes between releases.
>
> But the recommended approach is to look at changes file for each 
> version after 2.2.1 - and apply these changes.
>
> And if your code is in C - then the compiler will help in finding any 
> undocumented changes in prototypes.. etc..
>
> BTW: the current release version is 2.3.3 [so you might want to 
> upgrade to this version instead of 2.3.2]
>
> Satish
>
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello there,
> >
> > I am trying to port my application from petsc 2.2.1 to petsc
> 2.3.2-p10.
> > Has anybody compiled
> > The real life changes needed to make other than listed in the 
> > changes file?
> >
> > I really appreciate if you have hands on do's and don'ts for porting 
> > from petsc-2.2.1 to Petsc 2.3.2-p10.
> >
> > Looking forward to positive replies.
> >
> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> >
> > ....Jagruti
> >
> > NAWC
> >
>
>


--
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594




More information about the petsc-users mailing list