[petsc-dev] I hate PetscThreadComm

[Sean Farley]

Jed Brown writes:

> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>
>>    Nice, so presumably the RPI guys could potentially use this and toss their custom stuff?
>
> It's not publicly released (though I hope it will be).  And it's a
> research implementation (using proxy processes), so there is no reason
> to use this if you already have a flat MPI code that works well.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Damn it, you still cannot just make a statement without putting in caveats!