[petsc-dev] does next model mess up our histories

[Jed Brown]

Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
> I disagree on 'reset next' every few days as a fix to this problem. I suspect
> Jed will have a different objection for this reset..

It makes it harder to follow changes on 'next' (including whether
certain features get fixed) and users can't simply "git pull".  I think
it's useful to have 'next' persist between releases (we could do more
frequent feature releases).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20141002/a898eddc/attachment.sig>