[petsc-dev] ugliness due to missing lapack routines

[Jed Brown]

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> > How would they specify what they want to use? Hopefully using the
> options database.
>
>   Of course.
> >
> > Inlining could then be thought of as an extreme case of profile-guided
> optimization, in the sense that you run an instrumented instance of the
> code to determine which decisions have been made, then recompile (mostly
> just fusing the right things) and
>
>   Yup.


Did we just converge?

I was just getting in the groove. ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130208/24f3793d/attachment.html>