[petsc-dev] Is there a reason for short arch and host names?

Jed Brown five9a2 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 21:23:33 CDT 2012


As someone who believes in namespaces, it must be

x = PetscAdditionScalar(a,b);
On Jul 27, 2012 9:04 PM, "Barry Smith" <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
>    As someone who believes that abbreviations are the work of the devil I
> would require x = Addition(a,b)
>
>    Barry
>
>   And since I don't believe in templates it would actually be x =
> AdditionScalar(a,b)
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Jed Brown <five9a2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> By that logic, you should write +(a,b) instead of a+b. I'm looking
> forward
> >> to if (!(rank)) {...}.
> >
> > Not really, just for functions whose names are more than one-character
> > long. Duh.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120727/eb1b0e27/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list