[petsc-dev] configure issues

[Jed Brown]

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:33, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> A single system, with real scoping, easy debugging, more readable code,
> etc.


Would you like a pony? What does this even mean? There is logic for a PETSc
program to attach a debugger to itself. The details of that logic depends on
tests that are run by configure. PETSc does not presently require Python at
runtime. If you were to refactor it, where would the logic go and how would
it be called from C?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110209/f05b4ad1/attachment.html>