[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?

[Matthew Knepley]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
>  Etags search for _n_ I assumed that you did this.
>

This is definitely not me.

  Matt


>   Barry
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
>  On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>>
>> They are identical.
>>
>>  Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about the
>> other one. I have removed it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix?
>>
>>  Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that didn't not
>> need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this change in
>> changes/dev.html!
>>
>>  Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the value
>> in having two different ones since they generally seem to serve the same
>> purpose. Who will fix this?
>>
>> Where is all this stuff (and what) ?
>>
>>  Matt
>>
>>  Barry
>>
>>
>> Jed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100107/724134a7/attachment.html>