[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?

[Barry Smith]

   Etags search for _n_ I assumed that you did this.

    Barry

On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>  
> wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> They are identical.
>
>   Looks like someone added the DMMGGetDMMG() who didn't know about  
> the other one. I have removed it.
>
>
>
> Also, is there a mnemonic for the _n_* prefix?
>
>   Looks like someone went crazy encapsulating tons of stuff that  
> didn't not need to be encapsulated and DIDN'T properly document this  
> change in changes/dev.html!
>
>   Seems to me all the _n_ should be changed to _p_, I don't see the  
> value in having two different ones since they generally seem to  
> serve the same purpose. Who will fix this?
>
> Where is all this stuff (and what) ?
>
>   Matt
>
>   Barry
>
>
> Jed
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their  
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which  
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener