no file comments for hg

[Matthew Knepley]

We need to find out if per file comments are possible, but just not
supported by the tool.

  Matt

On 7/25/06, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Satish Balay wrote:
> >
> > > Yes - not having file comments makes it more difficult to go back in
> > > file history.
> > >
> > > But one way to look at it is - for some of these senarios - it meanas
> > > multiple changesets should be created [with the correct grouping of
> > > changes] instead of the atempted single changeset.
> >
> >    Yes, the problem with this is that there is no decent way of
> > making multiple change-sets.
>
> - quit emacs without typing in any comments  [so no commit is done]
> - 'hg status' to get the list of modified files
> - hg commit file1 file2 [ to make the appropriate changeset]
>
> I use 'hg ct' though..
>
> > If I could just edit out the files
> > I did not want when doing the comment for a commit it would make
> > life a MILLION times better (could that be added?).
>
> I'll check on this on the mercurial list..
>
> Satish
>
> >
> >    Barry
> >
> > >
> > > And perhaps some comments can actually go into the code.
> > >
> > > Satish
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Barry Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >   Not having file by file comments for changesets is
> > > > starting to annoy me.
> > > >
> > > >    Barry
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
"Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec
Guiness
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20060725/6750a8b3/attachment.html>