parallel-netcdf-1.1.1 released

[Gerald Creager]

Rob Latham wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:02:42PM -0600, Gerald Creager wrote:
>> Rob Latham wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:18:49PM -0600, Gerald Creager wrote:
>>>> Hmmm. Been trying here on Ranger.tacc.utexas.edu and I've not held
>>>> my mouth right.  Therefore, a question... do CC, CXX, FC, F90 need
>>>> to point to serial or parallel instances of the compiler?
>>> On Ranger, I think it might work out better if you let the configure
>>> script do most of the work.  do 'mpicc', 'mpif90', and 'mpicxx' live
>>> in the same directory?     the --with-mpi=/path/to/mpi_dir  option to
>>> configure should find everything you need.
>>>
>>> CC, CXX, FC, and F90 should be the parallel compilers, unless there is
>>> something quirky about your build environment.
>> Hi, Rob,
>>
>> I can get past configure and the environment variables are what I
>> generally use for WRF, anyway, so they're a non-issue.
>>
>> I'm getting a compile, but all I'm getting is libpnetcdf.a, and no
>> libpnetcdf.so. Is this expected behavior?
> 
> Yep, sounds like everything went just fine.  We don't produce shared
> libraries, so you won't find a libpnetcdf.so .  Do you require shared
> libraries?  It probably wouldn't be hard to add but in 6+ years we
> haven't had many (any?) requests for a shared version.

Lemme see how WRF behaves. I can probably create the WRF preprocessing 
system with NetcDF-3.6.3, but I desperately need parallel-NetCDF for one 
  the model domains I'm running... I'm dying now on I/O and was told 
simply this was the answer.

Thanks gerry
-- 
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843