[Nek5000-users] comp_vort3, nelt, conj_ht

nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Mon Mar 27 11:16:27 CDT 2017


Thank you Paul. Now comp_vort3 doesnt give zeros in the solid domain.
What is the difference between comp_vort3 and the calculation of curl using

        call gradm1(dAxdx,dAxdy,dAxdz,t(1,1,1,1,1))
        call gradm1(dAydx,dAydy,dAydz,t(1,1,1,1,2))
        call gradm1(dAzdx,dAzdy,dAzdz,t(1,1,1,1,3))
        call sub3(bfx1,dAzdy,dAydz,m)
        call sub3(bfy1,dAxdz,dAzdx,m)
        call sub3(bfz1,dAydx,dAxdy,m)
​When I compare the glsc3 of a curls computed by comp_vort3 and gradm1,
there is a difference of  0.5% to 1%.
Which procedure suits well, if I want to use u x curl in the userq

Sincerely,
Sandeep


>
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> This issue should now be resolved.
>
> comp_vort3() will now compute the curl of the supplied vector field over
> all elements, e=1,...,nelt.
>
> Moreover, prepost() has been modified to not put zeros in the velocity
> field when e > nelv.
>
> So, you should be able to do something like:
>
>        call comp_vort3(curlv,w1,w2,u,v,w)
>
>        call outpost(curlv(1,1),curlv(1,2),culrv(1,3),pr,t,'   ')
>
> and have the right thing happen.
>
> Paul
> ________________________________
> From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [
> nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of
> nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:57 PM
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] comp_vort3, nelt, conj_ht
>
> Hello Neks,
> I modified conj_ht example and defined three scalars. NEL>NELV. The domain
> of scalars is bigger than the fluid.
> I create a vector by taking the curl of three scalars, using
>   common /myvort/ b1(lx1,ly1,lz1,lelt,3),
>   call comp_vort3(b1,work1,work2,t(1,1,1,1,1),
> $     t(1,1,1,1,2),t(1,1,1,1,3))
>
> b1 is computed correctly in the fluid domain, but is solid domain it
> showing zero.
> Can someone tell me how to modify the comp_vort3 subroutine, to correctly
> compute b1 over the entire domain.
> I tried to modify call dudxyz(work1,w,rym1,sym1,tym1,jacm1,2,2), changing
> the imsh=2 (the last second parameter in the above call), but the the
> result remains the same.
> I use the three components of computed b1 in userq
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Sincerely,
> Sandeep
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20170327/20dd01a8/attachment.html>


More information about the Nek5000-users mailing list