[Nek5000-users] nelgv in uservp of conj_ht

nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jan 24 11:41:31 CST 2017


Case (1) is correct way to impose properties for the solid. The interface condition will match the fluxes (in a weak sense) while heat capacity can discontinuous.
 
-----Original message-----
> From:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday 24th January 2017 17:28
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] nelgv in uservp of conj_ht
> 
> Hello All,
> I have a question in uservp of conjugate heat transfer. I am trying to modify the conjugate heat transfer problem (with additional passive scalars) and use for solving MHD problem with vector potential approach.
> 
> I tested the conjugate heat transfer case changing the IF condition in uservp in following ways.      
> 
> Case 1:
>         if (ieg .gt. nelgv) then  ! properties in the solid
>             udiff   = 0.1*param(8) ! conductivity
>             utrans  = 1.0
>          endif
> 
> Case 2:
> 	if (y .ge. 1.5D0) then
> 		udiff= 0.1*param(8)
> 	elseif (y. le. 0.5D0) then
> 		udiff= 0.1*param(8)
> 	else
> 		udiff   = param(8)
> 	endif
> 
> I got a small difference in the temperature profile at the interface between solid and fluid. 
> Could you please let me know, how do the above two cases affect the conditions imposed at the interface (what is the mathematical treatment and how does it change).
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> Sandeep
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users


More information about the Nek5000-users mailing list