[mpich-discuss] Interesting Problem

Evans Jeffrey jje at purdue.edu
Sun Feb 20 06:53:49 CST 2011


Installed the patch, re-ran the test - similar result. The PBS output file this time is a bit different from the earlier one I sent you. Both are attached, the lower number is pre-patch, higher is post-patch. 

Thoughts?

jje

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pacetest.o3771
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 61038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/attachments/20110220/1d7964be/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pacetest.o3773
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 57876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/attachments/20110220/1d7964be/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
  
On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> On 02/19/2011 07:46 AM, Evans Jeffrey wrote:
>> Do all the patches need to be applied, a subset, or just one?
>> Is there a readme that helps with the patch installation process? or
>> do I need to rebuild the library from scratch?
> 
> All of them have to be applied. I've attached the combined patch for you 
> with this email. You can apply this patch using:
> 
> % cd mpich2-1.3.2p1
> 
> % patch -p0 < combined.patch
> 
> % make && make install
> 
>> Finally, do these patches appear in a more recent build - like p1?
> 
> No, 1.3.2p1 doesn't have this either.
> 
>  -- Pavan
> 
> -- 
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> <combined.patch>

Jeffrey J. Evans
jje at purdue.edu
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~evans6/





More information about the mpich-discuss mailing list