create/destroy name change proposal
Devine, Karen D
kddevin at sandia.gov
Fri May 7 12:06:35 CDT 2010
While we are changing names, let's clear up the confusion between "mesh
instance" and "mesh." These functions don't create/destroy a "mesh"; they
create/destroy a "mesh instance" (i.e, a mesh database). Many meshes can be
stored in a mesh instance, but we expect that in most cases, only one mesh
instance will be used.
How about
iMesh_newMesh --> iMesh_createMeshInstance
iMesh_dtor --> iMesh_destroyMeshInstance
Or, even better, following the example of iMesh_load and iMesh_save,
iMesh_newMesh -->iMesh_create
iMesh_dtor --> iMesh_destroy
Of course, I'd be happy to replace the word "instance" with "database"; any
takers? :)
Karen
On 5/6/10 11:33 AM, "Tim Tautges" <tautges at mcs.anl.gov> wrote
>
> Mark Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 08:51, Tim Tautges wrote:
>>
>> iMesh_newMesh --> iMesh_createMesh
>> iMesh_dtor --> iMesh_destroyMesh
>>
>> Yes, thats better than iMesh_new and iMesh_destroy. I agree.
More information about the tstt-interface
mailing list