Special-ness of root set: Impl. vs. data model

Tue Aug 31 11:41:33 CDT 2010

On 08/31/2010 11:06 AM, Mark Beall wrote:
> Which does mean that it should be clearly documented where it does or
> doesn't act like an entity set. This is similar to the part-entity set
> "duality" in iMeshP. A while ago, I went through all of the entity set
> functions and gave my opinion on which of those a part should act like
> an entity set. I think we got close to converging on an agreement on
> that, but probably not totally.
> 

Proposed changes attached.

- jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: imesh-root.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/tstt-interface/attachments/20100831/7fe92191/attachment.bin>