On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 12:22 -0600, Tim Armstrong wrote: > RE: log/ln/log10 > > I think this is pretty varied. I've seen contexts where log() meant either > log_e, log_2, or log_10. > > The completely unambiguous way would be to have ln(x), log(x, base) and > optionally log10(x) I like that. +1 Mihael