[Swift-devel] Making Swift run on Eureka

[Michael Wilde]

Thanks, David - that is indeed the mail we were looking for.

I think Jon confirmed today that 0.93 now works on Eureka with no changes.

Eureka!

:) Mike

----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kelly" <davidk at ci.uchicago.edu>
> To: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> Cc: "Swift Devel" <swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:34:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] Making Swift run on Eureka
> I don't know the details of this bug, but I remember seeing this email
> a few months ago if it helps..
> 
> ---- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Rich" <pmrich at gmail.com>
> > To: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> > Cc: support at alcf.anl.gov, "Robert Jacob" <jacob at mcs.anl.gov>,
> > "swift-devel" <swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>, "Andrew
> > Cherry" <acherry at alcf.anl.gov>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:39:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] [alcf-support #60887] Can Cobalt
> > command-line bug on Eureka be fixed?
> > Michael,
> >
> > I wanted to let you know that a recent patch to Cobalt on Eureka
> > should allow you to pass command-line arguments into the program
> > supplied to the Cobalt job. Let us know if you encounter any further
> > difficulties, and I am sorry that this took so long to deploy.
> >
> > Thank you for your patience,
> >
> > --
> > Paul Rich
> > ALCF Operations -- AIG
> > richp at alcf.anl.gov
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> > To: "Paul M. Rich" <richp at alcf.anl.gov>, "Andrew Cherry"
> > <acherry at alcf.anl.gov>
> > Cc: "swift-devel" <swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>, "Robert Jacob"
> > <jacob at mcs.anl.gov>, support at alcf.anl.gov
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:30:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [alcf-support #60887] Can Cobalt command-line bug on
> > Eureka be fixed?
> >
> > Paul, Andrew,
> >
> > What I think we're going to do on this from the Swift side is
> > temporarily try to use Eureka in a mode where we manually start
> > Swift
> > workers on the cluster using a batch job.
> >
> > We'll wait on testing the Swift Cobolt interface (which is different
> > than the above) until we hear from you that the bug is fixed and
> > ready
> > for testing.
> >
> > So even though it may be many weeks or more away, we'd like to put
> > in
> > our vote for fixing this issue (realizing that you have many other
> > priorities :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > MIke

-- 
Michael Wilde
Computation Institute, University of Chicago
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory