[Swift-devel] CDM Tests

Mon Nov 14 14:43:13 CST 2011

Yes, this is right. I added a rule for the outdir in the cdm file (which
was not added earlier) and all runs fails with the message: file not found
output/out?.txt.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Jon Monette <jonmon at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Output files do not work correctly in CDM.  CDM creates symlinks to the
> files that are used in the DIRECT CDM directive. When the app outputs it
> overwrites the symlink in the work directory and *doesn't* update the
> original file.  So the check to see if the expected output is the same as
> the correct output will fail. How are you checking to see if the app
> correctly ran?  Is there an error or is the original file in the cwd empty?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> To: "Ketan Maheshwari" <ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Swift Devel" <swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 1:59:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
>
> I meant the command line to the app() program, not the commandline to the
> swift command.
>
> - Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ketan Maheshwari" <ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com>
> > To: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> > Cc: "Swift Devel" <swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:50:48 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > All commandlines are in a run.sh script batched together. I am writing
> > a README in the testsuite to document this.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Michael Wilde < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ketan, in these tests, I thought that the names that the app actually
> > receives on its command line is worth documenting. Does that show
> > anything that the script writer should be aware of?
> >
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: "Michael Wilde" < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > To: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >
> > > Cc: "Swift Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:39:10 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > > Even though the tests worked in each of these 4 cases, the question
> > > remains of "did the app see the same path names" and "did copies get
> > > done"?
> > >
> > > So I think you need to dig deeper and explain the difference between
> > > what CDM does for the direct case, and how (if at all) the wrapper
> > > mode affects things.
> > >
> > > Its equally possible that CDM overrode the wrapper mode arg. Just
> > > specifying the wrapper mode arg will not, I think, achieve the
> > > elimination of the "copy to shared workflow directory" that "direct
> > > mode" accomplishes.
> > >
> > > - Mike
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >
> > > > To: "Michael Wilde" < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > Cc: "Swift Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >, "Justin M
> > > > Wozniak"
> > > > < wozniak at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:29:36 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In my initial email I said:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ... when specifying the relative option on the config for
> > > > wrapper.invocation.mode property the script works regardless of
> > > > the
> > > > paths of input/output.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Which made me conclude that the option specified in the config for
> > > > wrapper.invocation.mode property overrides the CDM policies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael Wilde < wilde at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ketan,
> > > >
> > > > I thought your initial email stated that the 4 cases of relative
> > > > path
> > > > names "worked". But this latter comment indicates that there is
> > > > some
> > > > kind of problem even in the relative cases.
> > > >
> > > > Can you clarify?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > To: "Justin M Wozniak" < wozniak at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > > Cc: "Michael Wilde" < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >, "Swift Devel" <
> > > > > swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:01:35 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > > > > Given the CDM's support for relative pathnames, I would expect
> > > > > the
> > > > > case of relative inputs, relative outputs would succeed
> > > > > irrespective
> > > > > of config. However, from the tests, it seems that the config
> > > > > option
> > > > > is
> > > > > overriding CDM directives.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Justin M Wozniak <
> > > > > wozniak at mcs.anl.gov > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > CDM DIRECT does not currently support absolute path names. I
> > > > > think
> > > > > we
> > > > > could provide something simple like "" for the field, as you
> > > > > suggest.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Michael Wilde wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would expect that for absolute path mappings, the user would
> > > > > > specify
> > > > > > either :: or "/" as the path in the CDM DIRECT pattern. In
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > words,
> > > > > > the user is saying "I have mapped the object to an absolute
> > > > > > path
> > > > > > name,
> > > > > > and I want the app to get exactly this name". Hence I think
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > best "location" field for a DIRECT rule is null ("").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Justin, can you clarify what the code expects for this case?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >> From: "Jonathan Monette" < jonmon at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > > >> To: "Michael Wilde" < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > > > > >> Cc: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >, "Swift
> > > > > >> Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > > > > >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:13:01 AM
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > > > > >> I couldn't tell from the excel(using my phone) but what was
> > > > > >> absolute?
> > > > > >> If I am not mistaken what CDM does is takes the path that is
> > > > > >> specified
> > > > > >> in the CDM file(which should be absolute) and appends the
> > > > > >> file
> > > > > >> path
> > > > > >> that is used in the swift script to it(which should be
> > > > > >> relative).
> > > > > >> So
> > > > > >> if they are both absolute I would expect it to fail.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Michael Wilde <
> > > > > >> wilde at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Thanks, Ketan - very nice tests and summary document.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I should point out for those that didn't open the doc: the 4
> > > > > >>> tests
> > > > > >>> with absolute pathnames are failing.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Ketan, can you work with Justin to see if this is a bug, or
> > > > > >>> if
> > > > > >>> the
> > > > > >>> CDM directive needs to be coded differently for absolute
> > > > > >>> paths?
> > > > > >>> Then
> > > > > >>> please test a fix, and as we discussed adapt the tests with
> > > > > >>> annotations to enhance the User Guide section on CDM.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> - Mike
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >>>> From: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >
> > > > > >>>> To: "Swift Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > > > > >>>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 8:13:48 AM
> > > > > >>>> Subject: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > > > > >>>> Hello,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I had a discussion with Mike about testing the CDM behavior
> > > > > >>>> for
> > > > > >>>> the
> > > > > >>>> following cases:
> > > > > >>>> 1. full versus relative paths for input
> > > > > >>>> 2. full versus relative paths for output
> > > > > >>>> 3. relative versus absolute option in config property:
> > > > > >>>> wrapper.invocation.mode
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> In this regard, I made 8 tests for all the above
> > > > > >>>> combinations.
> > > > > >>>> I
> > > > > >>>> used
> > > > > >>>> simple local provider in this first set of tests.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> From the tests it seems that when specifying the relative
> > > > > >>>> option
> > > > > >>>> on
> > > > > >>>> the config for wrapper.invocation.mode property the script
> > > > > >>>> works
> > > > > >>>> regardless of the paths of input/output.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> A detailed result with stdout, and paths to logs can be
> > > > > >>>> found
> > > > > >>>> here:
> > > > > >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmvYSwENKFY9dG44V2VjRXJlUmZLNG9saERFeWZDcUE
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> The tests are in my CI dir: /home/ketan/cdm_tests
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Regards, --
> > > > > >>>> Ketan
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>>> Swift-devel mailing list
> > > > > >>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > > > >>>>
> https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Michael Wilde
> > > > > >>> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > > > > >>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > > > > >>> Argonne National Laboratory
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>> Swift-devel mailing list
> > > > > >>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > > > >>>
> https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Justin M Wozniak
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Swift-devel mailing list
> > > > > Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > > > https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ketan
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Wilde
> > > > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > > > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > > > Argonne National Laboratory
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ketan
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michael Wilde
> > > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > > Argonne National Laboratory
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Swift-devel mailing list
> > > Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> >
> > --
> > Michael Wilde
> > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > Argonne National Laboratory
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ketan
>
> --
> Michael Wilde
> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swift-devel mailing list
> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
>

-- 
Ketan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20111114/7e9e34bc/attachment.html>