[Swift-devel] Re: coaster-service -passive null pointer exception
Mihael Hategan
hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Tue May 24 13:57:35 CDT 2011
I committed a tentative fix to trunk. I won't swear by it, but please
give it a try and let me know how it works.
Mihael
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:44 -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> Attached is the coaster.log that is being generated, but it doesn't
> contain much information.
>
> But where it was throwing the exception, I called getStrackTrace() to
> get more info and saved it. Hope this helps:
>
> org.globus.cog.abstraction.coaster.service.job.manager.JobQueue.nextId(JobQueue.java:122)
> org.globus.cog.abstraction.coaster.service.LocalTCPService.registrationReceived(LocalTCPService.java:58)
> org.globus.cog.abstraction.coaster.service.local.RegistrationHandler.requestComplete(RegistrationHandler.java:41)
> org.globus.cog.karajan.workflow.service.handlers.RequestHandler.receiveCompleted(RequestHandler.java:84)
> org.globus.cog.karajan.workflow.service.channels.AbstractKarajanChannel.handleRequest(AbstractKarajanChannel.java:390)
> org.globus.cog.karajan.workflow.service.channels.AbstractStreamKarajanChannel.step(AbstractStreamKarajanChannel.java:158)
> org.globus.cog.karajan.workflow.service.channels.AbstractStreamKarajanChannel$Multiplexer.run(AbstractStreamKarajanChannel.java:377)
>
> David
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Mihael Hategan <hategan at mcs.anl.gov>
> wrote:
> Do you have logs or exact stack trace for this?
>
>
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:21 -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When trying to run coaster-service in passive mode, I get a
> null
> > pointer exception when starting worker nodes. This seems to
> happen
> > when the worker node tries to register with the coaster
> service. I
> > get:
> >
> > Failed to process data: Failed to register (service returned
> error:
> > java.lang.NullPointerException)
> at /home/davidk/work/worker.pl line
> > 762.
> >
> > The exception gets thrown from RegistrationHandler.java.
> Running a
> > swift script before starting the workers seems to be the
> workaround..
> > but I think with the -passive option we shouldn't need to do
> that
> > anymore, is that correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
>
>
>
>
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list