[Swift-devel] duplicated job submission in swift-0.92?

Mihael Hategan hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Mar 30 20:35:00 CDT 2011


Something odd must have happened there with 0.92. I will go through the
commits and check.

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 19:58 -0500, Michael Wilde wrote:
> I wouldn't do that quite yet. This is very curious, but I think its the likely cause of what you are seeing.  The foreach() loop in this case seems to be having double vision :)  Its either some Swift subtlety or a bug:
> 
> login1$ cat zz1.swift
> int arr[];
> 
> iterate i
> {
>    arr[i] = i+1;
>    trace(i, arr[i]);
> }until(i == 1);
> 
> foreach a in arr {
>   trace("for", a);
> }
> 
> login1$ swift zz1.swift
> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> 
> RunID: 20110331-0053-tkh8yla5
> Progress:
> SwiftScript trace: 0, 1
> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> SwiftScript trace: 1, 2
> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> Final status:
> login1$ 
> 
> 
> But, Zhao, you could in the meantime use much simpler code like so:
> 
> login1$ cat zz2.swift
> 
> foreach a in [0:3] {
>   trace("for", a);
> }
> 
> login1$ swift zz2.swift
> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> 
> RunID: 20110331-0057-huo8jei0
> Progress:
> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> SwiftScript trace: for, 3
> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> SwiftScript trace: for, 0
> Final status:
> login1$ 
> 
> I suspect we need to make this more clear in the user guide and tutorials :)
> 
> - Mike
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Or just use the concurrent mapper to let swift handle the output
> > naming itself. The resume files can't persist through multiple
> > sessions though.
> > 
> > 2011/3/30 Michael Wilde <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>:
> > > The most common case for this error occurs when two iterations
> > > within a foreach loop map an output file to the same physical file
> > > name. When swift runs and tries to put the output object into its
> > > site cache, it sees that a file of the name name is already in the
> > > cache, and its semantics do not allow that.
> > >
> > > I have not yet stared at this code long enough to see if this
> > > explains what is happening here.
> > >
> > > I also dont know why it might work under one version and fail under
> > > 0.92. If the above situation is occurring, perhaps there is some
> > > randomness involved: loop iteration ordering; filename generation
> > > randomness or difference, etc.
> > >
> > > But I would debug with that in mind: make sure that all *output* fie
> > > names mapped by the script are unique. Ideally, one should be able
> > > to find the culprit by grepping the swift log for all the mapped
> > > file names and look for duplicates.
> > >
> > > - Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> Or maybe local variables are static? Maybe they mapped to different
> > >> files but to the same cache object? But I have been doing local
> > >> variables in my own workflows though.
> > >>
> > >> 2011/3/30 Jonathan Monette <jon.monette at gmail.com>:
> > >> > Ok. I understand this error better. But shouldn't that be a
> > >> > different
> > >> > error then? Like a and b are mapped to the same file? I don't
> > >> > know
> > >> > if Swift
> > >> > can know this but looking at the explanation and error it should
> > >> > unless this
> > >> > cache message has a deeper meaning.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Allan Espinosa
> > >> > <aespinosa at cs.uchicago.edu>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I had this error before when two output mapper objects mapped to
> > >> >> the same
> > >> >> file.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> $ swift bug_same.swift
> > >> >> Swift svn swift-r4208 cog-r3073
> > >> >>
> > >> >> RunID: 20110330-1818-ygec7ppa
> > >> >> Progress: time:0
> > >> >> The cache already contains
> > >> >> localhost:bug_same-20110330-1818-ygec7ppa/shared/foo.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The cache already contains
> > >> >> localhost:bug_same-20110330-1818-ygec7ppa/shared/foo.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Progress: time:1960 Stage in:1 Finished successfully:1
> > >> >> The cache already contains
> > >> >> localhost:bug_same-20110330-1818-ygec7ppa/shared/foo.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> [aespinosa at communicado testing]$
> > >> >> [aespinosa at communicado testing]$ cat bug_same.swift
> > >> >> type file;
> > >> >>
> > >> >> app (file out) echo(string input) {
> > >> >>  echo input stdout=@filename(out);
> > >> >> }
> > >> >>
> > >> >> file a <"foo">;
> > >> >> file b <"foo">;
> > >> >>
> > >> >> a = echo("hello world");
> > >> >> b = echo("foo bar");
> > >> >>
> > >> >> But i think you should be using other Swift mappers that does
> > >> >> auto-numbering of files by default.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Allan
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2011/3/30 Zhao Zhang <zhaozhang at uchicago.edu>:
> > >> >> > Hi guys,
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I am seeing something weird in swfit-0.92. Any idea about
> > >> >> > this?
> > >> >> > The swift script is very simple:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > zzhang at sandbox:~/workplace/Andrey> cat movies.swift
> > >> >> > type Pickle {}
> > >> >> > type History {}
> > >> >> > type Image {}
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > app (History historyout) movie_graph (int rerun, int epochs,
> > >> >> > Pickle
> > >> >> > picklefile)
> > >> >> > {
> > >> >> >   movie_graph rerun epochs;
> > >> >> > }
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > int arr[];
> > >> >> > iterate i
> > >> >> > {
> > >> >> >  arr[i] = i+1;
> > >> >> > }until(i == 1);
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > int epochs;
> > >> >> > epochs = 3;
> > >> >> > Pickle picklefile <single_file_mapper;
> > >> >> > file="for_movies.pickled">;
> > >> >> > foreach a in arr{
> > >> >> >  History historyout <single_file_mapper;
> > >> >> >  file=@strcat("output/rerun", a,
> > >> >> > "/histories.pickled-", a)>;
> > >> >> >  historyout = movie_graph(a, epochs, picklefile);
> > >> >> > }
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I ran the script with the latest 0.92 version, which is loaded
> > >> >> > as
> > >> >> > a
> > >> >> > module
> > >> >> > on beagle. The I saw this:
> > >> >> > zzhang at sandbox:~/workplace/Andrey> swift -tc.file ./tc.data
> > >> >> > movies.swift
> > >> >> > Variable epochs defined in scope 99878388 shadows variable of
> > >> >> > same name
> > >> >> > in
> > >> >> > scope 1813605401
> > >> >> > Variable picklefile defined in scope 99878388 shadows variable
> > >> >> > of
> > >> >> > same
> > >> >> > name
> > >> >> > in scope 1813605401
> > >> >> > Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > RunID: 20110330-1636-ev8vm8gb
> > >> >> > Progress:
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:3 Active:1
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:3 Checking status:1
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:2 Stage in:1 Finished successfully:1
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:2 Active:1 Finished successfully:1
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:2 Active:1 Finished successfully:1
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:1 Stage in:1 Finished successfully:2
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:1 Active:1 Finished successfully:2
> > >> >> > Progress: Selecting site:1 Checking status:1 Finished
> > >> >> > successfully:2
> > >> >> > The cache already contains
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > localhost:movies-20110330-1636-ev8vm8gb/shared/output/rerun1/histories.pickled-1.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Execution failed:
> > >> >> >        The cache already contains
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > localhost:movies-20110330-1636-ev8vm8gb/shared/output/rerun1/histories.pickled-1.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Then I switched to an older version, it worked well.
> > >> >> > zzhang at sandbox:~/workplace/Andrey> swift -tc.file ./tc.data
> > >> >> > movies.swift
> > >> >> > Variable epochs defined in scope 212602028 shadows variable of
> > >> >> > same name
> > >> >> > in
> > >> >> > scope 1538939834
> > >> >> > Variable picklefile defined in scope 212602028 shadows
> > >> >> > variable
> > >> >> > of same
> > >> >> > name
> > >> >> > in scope 1538939834
> > >> >> > Swift svn swift-r3291 (swift modified locally) cog-r2750 (cog
> > >> >> > modified
> > >> >> > locally)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > RunID: 20110330-1639-gmbyz1qa
> > >> >> > Progress:
> > >> >> > Progress: Active:2
> > >> >> > Progress: Active:1 Checking status:1
> > >> >> > Final status: Finished successfully:2
> > >> >> _______________________________________________
> 





More information about the Swift-devel mailing list