[Swift-devel] branching for stabilization of release .95
Mihael Hategan
hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Jan 3 15:37:49 CST 2011
Should be fixed in cog trunk/2990.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 04:35 -0600, Mihael Hategan wrote:
> I'll fix that tomorrow. Actually that's later today.
>
> Mihael
>
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:23 -0800, Sarah Kenny wrote:
> > sorry, forgot where we landed on the naming...as long as it's
> > somewhere btwn .91 and 1.0 we should be all right :) but yeah, i can
> > branch the release as .92. however, i just checked out trunk and am
> > getting some errors compiling:
> >
> > compile:
> > [echo] [provider-coaster]: COMPILE
> > [javac] Compiling 124 source files
> > to /home/skenny/builds/cog/modules/provider-coaster/build
> >
> > [javac] /home/skenny/builds/cog/modules/provider-coaster/src/org/globus/cog/abstraction/coaster/service/job/manager/Cpu.java:242: illegal start of type
> > [javac] if (shutdown) {
> > [javac] ^
> >
> > [javac] /home/skenny/builds/cog/modules/provider-coaster/src/org/globus/cog/abstraction/coaster/service/job/manager/Cpu.java:242: ';' expected
> > [javac] if (shutdown) {
> > [javac] ^
> >
> > [javac] /home/skenny/builds/cog/modules/provider-coaster/src/org/globus/cog/abstraction/coaster/service/job/manager/Cpu.java:242: not a statement
> > [javac] if (shutdown) {
> > [javac] ^
> >
> > [javac] /home/skenny/builds/cog/modules/provider-coaster/src/org/globus/cog/abstraction/coaster/service/job/manager/Cpu.java:242: ';' expected
> > [javac] if (shutdown) {
> > [javac] ^
> > [javac] 4 errors
> >
> >
> > p.s. happy new year to you too!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Michael Wilde <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>
> > wrote:
> > Indeed - that was the "great" part :)
> > I was just asking so we that we get the release number right
> > when we create the release branch.
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 16:46 -0600, Michael Wilde wrote:
> > > > Happy New Year, All!
> > >
> > > And to you, too!
> > > >
> > > > This sounds great, but wasn't the plan to call the current
> > stable
> > > > branch 0.91 and the current trunk 0.92?
> > >
> > > Irrespective of that, bug fixes from the branch should be
> > merged to
> > > trunk. And better to do so before trunk is branched into
> > another
> > > release
> > > branch.
> > >
> > > Mihael
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Wilde
> > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > Argonne National Laboratory
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swift-devel mailing list
> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list