[Swift-devel] duplicated job submission in swift-0.92?

[Mihael Hategan]

On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:45 -0500, Justin M Wozniak wrote:
> That's right- I will run it again today to confirm.
> 
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Michael Wilde wrote:
> 
> > Mihael,
> >
> > My understanding is that Justin used a binary search approach:

Nicely done.

>  he kept 
> > extracting a point-in-time snapshot from SVN, and built and tested it, 
> > selecting dates in binary-search mode until he narrowed down the 
> > revision range that caused the failure to between r3835 and r3837.
> >
> > Justin can confirm this when he sees this message, but don't count on 
> > confirmation very soon this weekend. Best to do you own tests to verify 
> > (or I can if that would help).
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> That's possible, looking at the code.
> >>
> >> Though what makes you think it's that?
> >>
> >> Mihael
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 17:33 -0500, Justin M Wozniak wrote:
> >>> I found that it appeared between Swift r3835 and r3837.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Michael Wilde wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> And Swift 0.91 works OK - it does *not* exhibit the twice-each
> >>>> bug.
> >>>>
> >>>> Justin: when you went backwards down the Swift 0.92 branch on
> >>>> Thursday
> >>>> morning, what did you find in terms of where it appeared the bug
> >>>> was
> >>>> introduced?
> >>>>
> >>>> - Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> I think we mist-spoke: The posted release 0.92 also exhibits the
> >>>>> twice-each bug as far as I acn tell.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mihael, Justin: can you test asap to confirm or refute that
> >>>>> observation?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which swift: ~/swift/rev/swift-0.92/bin/swift
> >>>>>
> >>>>> com$ swift -version
> >>>>> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> >>>>>
> >>>>> com$ cd ~/swift/lab
> >>>>> com$ cat zz3.swift
> >>>>> int arr[];
> >>>>>
> >>>>> arr[0]=1;
> >>>>> arr[1]=2;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> foreach a in arr {
> >>>>> trace("for", a);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> com$ swift zz3.swift
> >>>>> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> >>>>>
> >>>>> RunID: 20110401-1645-yyy87p39
> >>>>> Progress:
> >>>>> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> >>>>> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> >>>>> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> >>>>> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> >>>>> Final status:
> >>>>> com$
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> I think both are good as they are.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Would you like me to send it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mihael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 20:57 -0500, Michael Wilde wrote:
> >>>>>>> And I will send this to swift-user:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Dear Swift Users,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On March 29 we discovered that the Release 0.92 branches of the
> >>>>>>> Swift and CoG trees were changed after the release and a
> >>>>>>> concurrency
> >>>>>>> bug was introduced. If you are running Swift from this *source
> >>>>>>> code*
> >>>>>>> base, please revert back to a known-working release such as the
> >>>>>>> 0.92
> >>>>>>> binary release if at all possible.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We're working on restoring the 0.92 SVN branch to the correct
> >>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>> and will report back to this email list when that is done."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Anything else to say? Feel free to send this out, adjusted as
> >>>>>>> needed, or just tell me what to change and I will.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Mike
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>> Please check this proposed warning on the Downloads page and
> >>>>>>>> let
> >>>>>>>> me
> >>>>>>>> know if its what we need there:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/~wilde/swift/downloads/index.php
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I also fixed the 0.91 typo (but the downloads dont actually
> >>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>> this test web. I think they will once this is committed and
> >>>>>>>> pushed
> >>>>>>>> live).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Mike
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 20:14 -0500, Michael Wilde wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We decided the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - I will revert the changes in the 0.92 branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - re-commit bug fixes that were committed after the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - merge the 0.92 branch to trunk
> >>>>>>>>>>>> - fix the problems in trunk
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. But when and how does the fix get to users?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The package(s) are fine. Though we should probably also have
> >>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>>>> package. The merge was done after the package(s) were
> >>>>>>>>>> uploaded
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> swift site.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ah, great!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This only affects folks who have checked out from SVN the
> >>>>>>>>>> 0.92
> >>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>> after the merge 9 days (or so) ago.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hmm - I question that. The release we use, based on 0.92 on
> >>>>>>>>> Beagle,
> >>>>>>>>> shows the twice-each error, and it was made on Feb 25, about
> >>>>>>>>> 35
> >>>>>>>>> days
> >>>>>>>>> ago. Does this merit clarification?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We should send an email to the user list once this is fixed.
> >>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>> want to send an email warning them not to check out from SVN
> >>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>> download the precompiled package instead.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> OK. I cant say that this will reach everyone. Perhaps some
> >>>>>>>>> status
> >>>>>>>>> notes on the Download page are in order. The 0.91 link there
> >>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> wrong,
> >>>>>>>>> so we need to fix that page anyways.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I am a bit confused though. I would have expected the
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> come
> >>>>>>>>>> with some announcement of some form.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Agreed. We kept this low profile because we were trying to
> >>>>>>>>> coordinate
> >>>>>>>>> it with a Web change that we never accomplished. And we've
> >>>>>>>>> lost
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> habit of swift-user announcements but got to get back to
> >>>>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>> So, yes.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Either create a 0.92.1 release (sounds hard based on
> >>>>>>>>>>> above)
> >>>>>>>>>>> or create a 0.93 release (in which case should we create
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> 0.93
> >>>>>>>>>>> branch from trunk as soon as this is fixed?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How long to re-test? (Thats a question for Sarah, Justin,
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ketan)
> >>>>>>>>>>> Could this include the Cray support mods?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No! Fixing a problem is not a venue for introducing untested
> >>>>>>>>>> things
> >>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>> a release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I meant the Cray feature for 0.93 not 0.92.1
> >>>>>>>>> Yes, that should be tested.
> >>>>>>>>> But its being used pretty heavily.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> - Mike
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But it could be discussed separately :)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Mihael
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Michael Wilde
> >>>>>>>>> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> >>>>>>>>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> >>>>>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Swift-devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> >>>>>>>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Michael Wilde
> >>>>>>>> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> >>>>>>>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> >>>>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Swift-devel mailing list
> >>>>>>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> >>>>>>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Michael Wilde
> >>>>> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> >>>>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> >>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Swift-devel mailing list
> >>>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> >>>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>