[Swift-devel] problems with external dependencies
Ben Clifford
benc at hawaga.org.uk
Tue Mar 24 09:13:25 CDT 2009
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael Wilde wrote:
> So no matter how many parallel procedure calls a procedure triggers, directly
> or indirectly, through multiple levels of calls, the procedure does not return
> until all the calls below it on the stack have returned. is that correct?
yes.
> Is it technically the same for the foreach(), and in fact for every other
> statement (eg, if() ) - that each statement essentially starts a "block" that
> may invoke parallel procs, and again, each statement waits for its child
> statements and procs to complete before it completes?
at an implementation level, yes. though 'completes' doesn't have much
effect in almost all circumstances - compound procedures are the only
place (I think) where completion of all the statements then causes some
other effect (the explicit closing of all returned values). everywhere
else, I think you cannot notice that.
> Is it further true that the term "closing" applies to all vars, of all types,
> whether atomic or compound?
yes.
> Where "closed" is the same as "set" for atomic
> vars?
yes
> And that:
> - the "setting" of external type vars is tied to the procedure that *returns*
> them?
yes
> - the "setting" of other atomic vars happens when they are assigned a value in
> an assignment statement.
yes
> - the setting of arrays is based on flow analysis (as per below, from a prior
> thread)
arrays get closed in two places: when they are returned from a procedure
call, and when static analysis has determined that all expressions that
can assign to an array have been evaluated. As you discovered, this second
only happens for the root of a multidimensional array, so is not
sufficient...
> - the setting of structures is ??? (when all fields are set or when that
> structure goes out of scope?
Arrays need closing to indicate that all of their members are known. A
structure has predefined members so closing doesn't come into play there.
> - the setting of file vars means that the file has been created by an app. The
> var contains only a mapping (which is set before the file is created) and a
> state, set/unset, somewhat like externals. So externals are almost? exactly
> like file vars, but have no mapping?
yes. The best analogy is that they are mapped but in your head rather than
in SwiftScript.
--
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list