[Swift-devel] 'mapped type' terminology
Ben Clifford
benc at hawaga.org.uk
Wed Jan 28 08:31:47 CST 2009
>From hpdc draft:
> Types in Swift can be atomic or composite. An atomic type can be either
> a primitive type or a mapped type.
The phrasing of this kinda excludes the idea that composite types might be
mapped, which is not true at all...
The atomic types that are mapped to single files are what I initially
called marker types; a better term was sought for that but 'mapped type'
is not it in my opinion - being a mapped type or not is orthogonal to the
atomic/composite distinction.
--
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list