[Swift-devel] Re: [Swift-user] Swift finished with errors

[Mihael Hategan]

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 23:51 +0000, Ben Clifford wrote:
> > Also as long as we're talking about processes that don't parallelize 
> > well on a single CPU (such as CPU-bound ones).
> 
> though that applies to pretty much any managed resource.
> 
> This is a fairly conservative default that a user is free to change if 
> they really want to; on shared systems, which is where most people seem to 
> be running swift, I'd much prefer that this doesn't flood the system with 
> CPU intensive processes.

I'm talking about localhost.
We're unable to reduce the user's application in any reasonable form.
However, my guess is that, statistically, something like 4 or 8 would
yield better results, even, perhaps, on shared filesystems, for which we
have some "fixes" in place.

>