[Swift-devel] coaster status summary
Ian Foster
foster at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Apr 7 07:35:41 CDT 2008
I wonder whether we should be making use of MPI on the BG/P where we can
... I suspect that is what is optimized, rather than the IP stack.
Mihael Hategan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 07:03 +0000, Ben Clifford wrote:
>
>> there's an interesting issue here of how much we should (in our general
>> codebase, rather than in special customisations such as plugging in
>> falkon) be supporting 'wierd' systems such as the BG/P which have,
>> apparently, neither a decent shared filesystem or IP layer network fabric,
>> vs support for more traditional clusters which seem to have both IP layer
>> interconnect between nodes and decent shared filesystems.
>>
>
> That is a good point. However, UDP was chosen to support systems with a
> very large number of CPUs in the first place. In other words if UDP
> won't work on BG/P, I don't see much reason for going with it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swift-devel mailing list
> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20080407/cd00a190/attachment.html>
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list