[Swift-devel] [Bug 72] Campaign for scaling wf up to 244 molecules

[Mihael Hategan]

On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 02:10 +0000, Ian Foster wrote:
> Why do you say the workflow's size was "impossible"? It doesn't seem that large to me. We'd like to run larger ones!

Most certainly so. However, we want to make use of loops rather than
generating large swift files.

> 
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla-daemon at mcs.anl.gov
> 
> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:52:07 
> To:swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> Subject: [Swift-devel] [Bug 72] Campaign for scaling wf up to 244 molecules
> 
> 
> http://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=72
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Comment #6 from hategan at mcs.anl.gov  2007-06-30 17:52 -------
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Hi again,
> > Here is an update of yesterday's 244 molecule run.  The experiment ran further
> > than before, but it still did not complete.  There were 240 molecules that
> > completed successfully (in the previous run, no molecule finished), but 4
> > molecules still did not finish. 
> > 
> 
> Actually it looks tasks worked fine:
> bash-3.1$ cat MolDyn-244-63ar6atbg2ae1.log |grep "type=1.*ubmitted"|wc
>   24309  243090 2806214
> bash-3.1$ cat MolDyn-244-63ar6atbg2ae1.log |grep "type=1.*ailed"|wc
>    3614   36140  405816
> bash-3.1$ cat MolDyn-244-63ar6atbg2ae1.log |grep "type=1.*ompleted"|wc
>   20695  206950 2389556
> 
> All tasks are accounted for. It may be that some jobs failed 3 times in a row.
> >From the logs it looks like the workflow almost finished and it got to the
> point where the error reporting was to be done. Perhaps the stack overflow that
> you saw occurred there, and perhaps the impossible size of the workflow might
> have something to do with it.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Swift-devel mailing list
> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel