[Swift-devel] [Bug 89] Use unique package names!

[Mihael Hategan]

That seems like the most reasonable choice.

On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 23:51 -0500, Ian Foster wrote:
> as Swift is a Globus incubator, org.globus.swift looks good to me.
> 
> bugzilla-daemon at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/swift/show_bug.cgi?id=89
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #1 from hategan at mcs.anl.gov  2007-08-29 20:04 -------
> > The solution is to refactor the conflicting packages. Given that any change in
> > the  package names will cause an equal amount of bad things, regardless of what
> > the new name is, we now have the option of choosing any package name.
> >
> > Also, given that org.gryphin.vdl isn't technically the right prefix root for
> > Swift packages anyway, there's the question of what the new one should be:
> >
> > 1. edu.uchicago.ci.swift?
> > 2. gov.anl.mcs.swift?
> > 3. org.globus.swift?
> > 4. org.globus.cog.swift? :)
> >
> > Please vote.
> >
> > (PS: Only the absolutely necessary package names should be changed first, and
> > we can analyze the implications of changing the other ones later, but there is
> > this minimal conflicting set that needs to be changed)
> >
> >
> >   
>