[Swift-commit] r3890 - text/parco10submission

[noreply at svn.ci.uchicago.edu]

Author: dsk
Date: 2011-01-07 10:41:11 -0600 (Fri, 07 Jan 2011)
New Revision: 3890

Modified:
   text/parco10submission/ResponseToReviews.txt
Log:
one more reviewer issue has been addressed


Modified: text/parco10submission/ResponseToReviews.txt
===================================================================
--- text/parco10submission/ResponseToReviews.txt	2011-01-07 16:37:32 UTC (rev 3889)
+++ text/parco10submission/ResponseToReviews.txt	2011-01-07 16:41:11 UTC (rev 3890)
@@ -288,8 +288,14 @@
 simplification, I know, but why not be honest and refer to nodes
 instead of cores?
 
->>> <<<
+>>>  Response:
 
+In Swift, individual tasks generally run on cores, so cores is the correct
+term.
+
+<<<
+
+
 15. "Swift is implemented by compiling to a Karajan program".  Why
 would one want to _compile_ a scripting language?  It seems more natural
 (to this naive reader) to have an interpreter or a translator.