[petsc-users] Modify matrix nonzero structure
Barry Smith
bsmith at petsc.dev
Mon May 27 14:46:33 CDT 2024
Thanks for reporting this. It is a bug. I have a fixed branch barry/2024-05-27/fix-bug-baij-setvaluesblocked/release and associated merge request https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/7578__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fqfhE-8CI9FL_VmWzwZRznl4gJgsMBvTJLtOwy_-xlB0_E7eNIPBulP0wrAkJxy-H-kmGyRmM9q4YX3bADC2MNo$
Barry
> On May 26, 2024, at 10:45 PM, Adrian Croucher <a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I've been trying creating a matrix with DMCreateMatrix() and then adding extra blocks of nonzeros into it using MatSetValuesBlocked(), but getting some unexpected results if I set the matrix type to BAIJ. It seems to behave as expected if I use matrix type AIJ.
>
> I've attached a minimal example program. It reads in the DMPlex from file, sets up a section on it, creates a matrix (blocksize 2) and then inserts a single 2x2 block at global block indices (0,7). It views the matrix before and after the insertion.
>
> If I run with "-dm_mat_type aij" it gives the expected results, but with "-dm_mat_type baij" it doesn't - e.g. if run in serial, it adds the new nonzeros in the right place but also adds a whole lot of other duplicated entries in block row 0.
>
> Is there something I'm not understanding about BAIJ, or about MatSetValuesBlocked()? or possibly some other mistake?
>
> - Adrian
>
> On 20/05/24 12:24 pm, Barry Smith wrote:
>>
>> You can call MatSetOption(mat,MAT_NEW_NONZERO_LOCATION_ERR) then insert the new values. If it is just a handful of new insertions the extra time should be small.
>>
>> Making a copy of the matrix won't give you a new matrix that is any faster to insert into so best to just use the same matrix.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>>> On May 19, 2024, at 7:44 PM, Adrian Croucher <a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz> <mailto:a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>>>
>>> This Message Is From an External Sender
>>> This message came from outside your organization.
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I have a Jacobian matrix created using DMCreateMatrix(). What would be
>>> the best way to add extra nonzero entries into it?
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that DMCreateMatrix() allocates the storage so the nonzero
>>> structure can't really be easily modified. Would it be a case of
>>> creating a new matrix, copying the nonzero entries from the original one
>>> and then adding the extra ones, before calling MatSetUp() or similar? If
>>> so, how exactly would you copy the nonzero structure from the original
>>> matrix?
>>>
>>> Background: the flow problem I'm solving (on a DMPlex with finite volume
>>> method) has complex source terms that depend on the solution (e.g.
>>> pressure), and can also depend on other source terms. A simple example
>>> is when fluid is extracted from one location, with a pressure-dependent
>>> flow rate, and some of it is then reinjected in another location. This
>>> can result in poor nonlinear solver convergence. I think the reason is
>>> that there are effectively missing Jacobian entries in the row for the
>>> reinjection cell, which should have an additional dependence on the
>>> solution in the cell where fluid is extracted.
>>>
>>> - Adrian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr Adrian Croucher
>>> Senior Research Fellow
>>> Department of Engineering Science
>>> Waipapa Taumata Rau / University of Auckland, New Zealand
>>> email: a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz>
>>> tel: +64 (0)9 923 4611
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Dr Adrian Croucher
> Senior Research Fellow
> Department of Engineering Science
> Waipapa Taumata Rau / University of Auckland, New Zealand
> email: a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:a.croucher at auckland.ac.nz>
> tel: +64 (0)9 923 4611
> <3x3grid.exo><matmodify.F90>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20240527/c962981c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list