[petsc-users] Question for PETSc Fortran users on design moving forward
Sanjay Govindjee
s_g at berkeley.edu
Wed Jun 5 13:38:35 CDT 2024
Barry,
As a regular used of PETSc in Fortran, I see no problem with these
changes to the Fortran interface.
-sanjay
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On 6/5/24 10:14 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
> I am working to improve PETSc support for Fortran and to automate more
> of the process so our Fortran coverage will be complete and always
> up-to-date. This will require a few small changes in the usage from
> Fortran. Could you please take a look
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside your organization.
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> I am working to improve PETSc support for Fortran and to automate more
> of the process so our Fortran coverage will be complete and always
> up-to-date.
>
> This will require a few small changes in the usage from Fortran.
>
> Could you please take a look at
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/7598__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!dKLBSAnenMU1lr3Pg_M0T1qvoWiBvqo_0NP1_-544KCKB0AU__0Heoo5RNYhIM6qXB_12xi6pOcs5cFDC6osQA$
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/7598__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fnJy7aGoJDjNKY2hei6kcg1iNooee8vbE8XyX8qLz59wS4gTMHh87-8bO041Q0fvKaLCzgbUmH9QjqxFvI_CK2k$> and
> make any comments or suggestions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Barry
>
> The changes would appear in the next release of PETSc in October and
> would not slightly backward incompatible with older versions of PETSc.
> But the compiler will tell you what needs to be updated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20240605/cbc81c13/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list