[petsc-users] KSP number of iterations different from size of residual array
Barry Smith
bsmith at petsc.dev
Thu Jan 11 11:26:24 CST 2024
Trying again.
Normally, numIts would be one less than nEntries since the initial residual is computed (and stored in the history) before any iterations.
Is this what you are seeing or are you seeing other values for the two?
I've started a run of the PETSc test suite that compares the two values for inconsistencies for all tests to see if I can find any problems.
Barry
Also note the importance of the reset value in KSPSetResidualHistory() which means the values will not match when reset is PETSC_FALSE.
> On Jan 10, 2024, at 7:09 PM, Kevin G. Wang <kevinw3 at vt.edu> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> I am writing a code that uses PETSc/KSP to solve linear systems. I just realized that after running "KSPSolve(...)", the number of iterations given by
>
> KSPGetIterationNumber(ksp, &numIts)
>
> is *different* from the size of the residual history given by
>
> KSPGetResidualHistory(ksp, NULL, &nEntries);
>
> That is, "numIts" is not equal to "nEntries". Is this expected, or a bug in my code? (I thought they should be the same...)
>
> I have tried several pairs of solvers and preconditioners (e.g., fgmres & bjacobi, ibcgs & bjacobi). This issue happens to all of them.
>
> Thanks!
> Kevin
>
> --
> Kevin G. Wang, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Kevin T. Crofton Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering
> Virginia Tech
> 1600 Innovation Dr., VTSS Rm 224H, Blacksburg, VA 24061
> Office: (540) 231-7547 | Mobile: (650) 862-2663
> URL: https://www.aoe.vt.edu/people/faculty/wang.html
> Codes: https://github.com/kevinwgy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20240111/77240fb5/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list