[petsc-users] (Sub) KSP initial guess with PCREDISTRIBUTE

Tue Aug 22 19:36:05 CDT 2023

  I have added support in https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/6834 branch barry/2023-08-22/pcredistribute-initial-guess please let me know if it does not work cleanly for you.

   Thanks
   Barry

> On Aug 21, 2023, at 4:18 PM, Jonas Lundgren <jonas.lundgren at liu.se> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Barry!
>  
> What solution do you have in mind? I tried a bit myself using SCATTER_FORWARD of the input vector x in PCApply_Redistribute, together with allowing for nonzero initial guess in KSPPREONLY, but that might not be the best solution in a public branch?
>  
> I guess the big gain is due to the fact that the subsequent solvings of state/adjoint problems are done with similar (but not exactly the same) linear operator, so that they become almost the same problem. On the other hand, the state and adjoint problems are not similar to each other, making the solution to one a very bad initial guess to the other.
>  
> Again, thank you for your support.
>  
> Best regards,
> Jonas Lundgren
>  
> Från: Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev <mailto:bsmith at petsc.dev>> 
> Skickat: den 21 augusti 2023 22:04
> Till: Jonas Lundgren <jonas.lundgren at liu.se <mailto:jonas.lundgren at liu.se>>
> Kopia: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> Ämne: Re: [petsc-users] (Sub) KSP initial guess with PCREDISTRIBUTE
>  
>  
>   Ok, thanks. Definitely more than I expected.
>  
>   It is easy to add the support you requested. I'll push a branch latter today.
>  
>   Barry
>  
> 
> 
> On Aug 21, 2023, at 3:28 PM, Jonas Lundgren <jonas.lundgren at liu.se <mailto:jonas.lundgren at liu.se>> wrote:
>  
> Dear Barry,
>  
> I have tried what you suggested on a (not too large) test example on a bigger cluster that I have access to, using -redistribute_ksp_initial_guess_nonzero 0 and 1, respectively. The average timings during the 5 first (design) iterations are 8.7 s (state) and 7.9 s (adjoint) for the case with zero initial guesses and 5.0 s (state) and 5.7 s (adjoint) for the cases with nonzero initial guesses. These solvings are the bottleneck of my program, accounting for about 60-90% of the total computational time, depending on various parameters. The program is basically consisting of the loop: solve state > solve adjoint > update design > repeat. This is repeated for a couple of hundred iterations.
>  
> From my experience, the number of iterations to convergence in each state/adjoint solve will decrease when increasing the (design) iterative counter (i.e. the longer the process has gone on for) IF the initial guess is the solution to the previous solve. This is because the design update is smaller in the end of the process than in the beginning, and a smaller design update leads to smaller changes in state/adjoint solution between subsequent (design) iterations. This means that the numbers provided above are on the low side: most likely the savings can be even more in the end of the design process.
>  
> Best regards,
> Jonas Lundgren
>  
> Från: Barry Smith <bsmith at petsc.dev <mailto:bsmith at petsc.dev>> 
> Skickat: den 21 augusti 2023 20:13
> Till: Jonas Lundgren <jonas.lundgren at liu.se <mailto:jonas.lundgren at liu.se>>
> Kopia: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> Ämne: Re: [petsc-users] (Sub) KSP initial guess with PCREDISTRIBUTE
>  
>  
>    When you use 2 KSP so that you can use the previous "solution" as the initial guess for the next problem, how much savings do you get? In iterations inside PCREDISTRIBUTE and in time (relative to the entire linear solver time and relative to the entire application run)?  You can get this information running with -log_view
>  
>    That is, run the 2 KSP simulation twice, once with the inner KSPSetNonzeroInitialGuess() on and once with it off and compare the times for the two cases.
>  
>   Thanks
>  
>    Barry
>  
>    Using KSPSetNonzeroInitialGuess() requires an extra matrix-vector product and preconditioner application, so I would like to verify that you have a measurable performance improvement with the initial guess.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 21, 2023, at 7:06 AM, Jonas Lundgren via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
>  
> Dear PETSc users,
>  
> I have a problem regarding the setting of initial guess to KSP when using PCREDISTRIBUTE as the preconditioner. (The reason to why I use PCREDISTRIBUTE is because I have a lot of fixed DOF in my problem, and PCREDISTRIBUTE successfully reduces the problem size and therefore speeds up the solving).
>  
> First, some details:
> -          I use a version of PETSc 3.19.1
> -          The KSP I use is KSPPREONLY, as suggested in the manual pages of PCREDISTRIBUTE:https://petsc.org/release/manualpages/PC/PCREDISTRIBUTE/
> -          I use KSPBCGSL as sub-KSP. I can perfectly well solve my problem using this as my main KSP, but the performance is much worse than when using it as my sub-KSP (under KSPPREONLY+PCREDISTRIBUTE) due to the amount of fixed DOF
> -          I am first solving a state problem, then an adjoint problem using the same linear operator.
> -          The adjoint vector is used as sensitivity information to update a design. After the design update, the state+adjoint problems are solved again with a slightly updated linear operator. This is done for hundreds of (design) iteration steps
> -          I want the initial guess for the state problem to be the state solution from the previous (design) iteration, and same for the adjoint problem
> -          I am aware of the default way of setting a custom initial guess: KSPSetInitialGuessNonzero(ksp, PETSC_TRUE) together with providing the actual guess in the x vector in the call to KSPSolve(ksp, b, x)
>  
> The main problem is that PCREDISTRIBUTE internally doesn’t use the input solution vector (x) when calling KSPSolve() for the sub-KSP. It zeroes out the solution vector (x) when starting to build x = diag(A)^{-1} b in the beginning of PCApply_Redistribute(), and uses red->x as the solution vector/initial guess when calling KSPSolve(). Therefore, I cannot reach the sub-KSP with an initial guess.
>  
> Additionally, KSPPREONLY prohibits the use of having a nonzero initial guess (the error message says “it doesn’t make sense”). I guess I can remove the line raising this error and recompile the PETSc libraries, but it still won’t solve the previously mentioned problem, which seems to be the hard nut to crack.
>  
> So far, I have found out that if I create 2 KSP object, one each for the state and adjoint problems, it is enough with calling KSPSetInitialGuessNonzero(subksp, PETSC_TRUE) on the subksp. It seems as if the variable red->x in PCApply_Redistribute() is kept untouched in memory between calls to the main KSP and therefore is used as (non-zero) initial guess to the sub-KSP. This has been verified by introducing PetscCall(PetscObjectCompose((PetscObject)pc,"redx",(PetscObject)red->x)); in PCApply_Redistribute(), recompiling the PETSc library, and then inserting a corresponding PetscObjectQuery((PetscObject)pc, "redx", (PetscObject *)&redx); in my own program source file.
>  
> However, I would like to only create 1 KSP to be used with both the state and adjoint problems (same linear operator), for memory reasons. When I do this, the initial guesses are mixed up between the two problems: the initial guess for the adjoint problem is the solution to the state problem in the current design iteration, and the initial guess for the state problem is the solution to the adjoint problem in the previous design iteration. These are very bad guesses that increases the time to convergence in each state/adjoint solve.
>  
> So, the core of the problem (as far as I can understand) is that I want to control the initial guess red->x in PCApply_Redistribute().
>  
> The only solution I can think of is to include a call to PetscObjectQuery() in PCApply_Redistribute() to obtain a vector with the initial guess from my main program. And then I need to keep track of the initial guesses for my both problems in my main program myself (minor problem). This is maybe not the neatest way, and I do not know if this approach affects the performance negatively? Maybe one call each to PetscObjectQuery() and PetscObjectCompose() per call to PCApply_Redistribute() is negligible?
>  
> Is there another (and maybe simpler) solution to this problem? Maybe I can SCATTER_FORWARD the input x vector in PCApply_Redistribute() before it is zeroed out, together with allowing for non-zero initial guess in KSPPREONLY?
>  
> Any help is welcome!
>  
>  
> Best regards,
> Jonas Lundgren

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20230822/7f668bcc/attachment-0001.html>