[petsc-users] Different solution while running in parallel

[Mark Adams]

Maybe I am missing something but I don't see MUMPS in the ksp_view. Just LU.
The built-in LU is not parallel and so with > 1 MPI process you get one
iteration of block Jacobi, so these results look fine to me, at least up to
this point.

Mark

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:37 AM Karthikeyan Chockalingam - STFC UKRI via
petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Hi Matt and Hong,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> I made the following changes, to get the desired output
>
>
>
>     PetscReal norm; /* norm of solution error */
>
>     PetscInt  its;
>
>     KSPConvergedReason reason;
>
>     PetscViewerAndFormat *vf;
>
>     PetscViewerAndFormatCreate(PETSC_VIEWER_STDOUT_WORLD,
> PETSC_VIEWER_DEFAULT, &vf);
>
>
>
>     ierr = KSPView(ksp, PETSC_VIEWER_STDOUT_SELF);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
>
>     KSPSolve(ksp, b, x);
>
>
>
>     ierr = KSPMonitorTrueResidual(ksp,its,norm,vf);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = KSPMonitorSingularValue(ksp, its, norm, vf);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
>
> I have attached the outputs from both the runs. As before, I am also
> printing A, b, and x.
>
>
>
> I wonder if it is a memory issue related to mpi library employed. I am
> currently using openmpi – should I instead use mpich?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Karthik.
>
>
>
> *From: *Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 12:19
> *To: *Zhang, Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Cc: *petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>, Chockalingam,
> Karthikeyan (STFC,DL,HC) <karthikeyan.chockalingam at stfc.ac.uk>
> *Subject: *Re: [petsc-users] Different solution while running in parallel
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 9:07 PM Zhang, Hong via petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Karhik,
>
> Can you find out the condition number of your matrix?
>
>
>
> Also, run using
>
>
>
>   -ksp_view -ksp_monitor_true_residual -ksp_converged_reason
>
>
>
> and send the two outputs.
>
>
>
>   Thanks,
>
>
>
>       Matt
>
>
>
> Hong
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* petsc-users <petsc-users-bounces at mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of
> Karthikeyan Chockalingam - STFC UKRI via petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 16, 2022 6:04 PM
> *To:* petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject:* [petsc-users] Different solution while running in parallel
>
>
>
>   Hello,
>
>
>
>    I tried to solve a (FE discretized) Poisson equation using PCLU. For
> some reason I am getting different solutions while running the problem on
> one and two cores. I have attached the output file (out.txt) from both the
> runs. I am printing A, b and x from both the runs – while A and b are the
> same but the solution seems is different.
>
>
>
> I am not sure what I doing wrong.
>
>
>
> Below is my matrix, vector, and solve setup.
>
>
>
>
>
>     Mat A;
>
>     Vec b, x;
>
>
>
>     ierr = MatCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD, &A); CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = MatSetType(A, MATMPIAIJ); CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = MatSetSizes(A, PETSC_DECIDE, PETSC_DECIDE, N, N); CHKERRQ
> (ierr);
>
>     ierr = MatMPIAIJSetPreallocation(A,d_nz, *NULL*, o_nz, *NULL*);
> CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = MatSetOption(A,MAT_SYMMETRIC,PETSC_TRUE); CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = MatCreateVecs(A, &b, &x); CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
>
>     KSP           ksp;
>
>     PC            pc;
>
>     KSPCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD, &ksp);
>
>     KSPSetOperators(ksp, A, A);
>
>     ierr = KSPSetType(ksp,KSPPREONLY);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = KSPGetPC(ksp,&pc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = PCSetType(pc,PCLU);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     ierr = PCFactorSetMatSolverType(pc,MATSOLVERMUMPS);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>     KSPSolve(ksp, b, x);
>
>
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
>
>
> Karhik.
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use,
> disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and
> should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your
> system. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has taken every reasonable
> precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing
> viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and
> malware checks before opening the attachments. UKRI does not accept any
> liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to
> presence of any viruses.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20221128/2ce871b3/attachment.html>