[petsc-users] [petsc-maint] Issues linking petsc header files and lib from FORTRAN codes

Mon Nov 7 11:59:30 CST 2022

Hi Satish,

I wonder if you know anything about another issue: after compiling petsc on
a cluster, when I tried to link my Fortran code with compiled libpetsc.so,
the shared library, I got the following errors:
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.9' not found (required by
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold)
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold)
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.29' not found (required by
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold)
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.20' not found (required by
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold)
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold:
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found (required by
/cluster/software/binutils/2.37-GCCcore-11.2.0/bin/ld.gold)

Not sure if it is related to discussion in this post (
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/issues/997), but after I tried the
configure option --with-cxx=0, I still got the same errors.
My make.log file for compiling petsc is attached here. Also, the
dependencies of the compiled petsc is:

>>: ldd arch-linux-c-debug/lib/libpetsc.so
linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffd80348000)
libflexiblas.so.3 =>
/cluster/software/FlexiBLAS/3.0.4-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libflexiblas.so.3
(0x00007f6e8b93f000)
libpthread.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f6e8b723000)
libm.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f6e8b421000)
libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f6e8b21d000)
libmpi_usempif08.so.40 =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libmpi_usempif08.so.40
(0x00007f6e8fd92000)
libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so.40 =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so.40
(0x00007f6e8fd84000)
libmpi_mpifh.so.40 =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libmpi_mpifh.so.40
(0x00007f6e8fd0c000)
libmpi.so.40 => /cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libmpi.so.40
(0x00007f6e8fbfa000)
libgfortran.so.5 => /cluster/software/GCCcore/11.2.0/lib64/libgfortran.so.5
(0x00007f6e8af70000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /cluster/software/GCCcore/11.2.0/lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007f6e8fbe0000)
libquadmath.so.0 => /cluster/software/GCCcore/11.2.0/lib64/libquadmath.so.0
(0x00007f6e8af28000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f6e8ab5a000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f6e8fbb3000)
libopen-rte.so.40 =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libopen-rte.so.40
(0x00007f6e8aa9e000)
libopen-orted-mpir.so =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libopen-orted-mpir.so
(0x00007f6e8fbdb000)
libopen-pal.so.40 =>
/cluster/software/OpenMPI/4.1.1-GCC-11.2.0/lib/libopen-pal.so.40
(0x00007f6e8a9ea000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007f6e8a7d5000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f6e8a5d2000)
libhwloc.so.15 =>
/cluster/software/hwloc/2.5.0-GCCcore-11.2.0/lib/libhwloc.so.15
(0x00007f6e8a575000)
libpciaccess.so.0 =>
/cluster/software/libpciaccess/0.16-GCCcore-11.2.0/lib/libpciaccess.so.0
(0x00007f6e8a56a000)
libxml2.so.2 =>
/cluster/software/libxml2/2.9.10-GCCcore-11.2.0/lib/libxml2.so.2
(0x00007f6e8a3f6000)
libz.so.1 => /cluster/software/zlib/1.2.11-GCCcore-11.2.0/lib/libz.so.1
(0x00007f6e8a3dd000)
liblzma.so.5 => /cluster/software/XZ/5.2.5-GCCcore-11.2.0/lib/liblzma.so.5
(0x00007f6e8a3b5000)
libevent_core-2.0.so.5 => /lib64/libevent_core-2.0.so.5 (0x00007f6e8a18a000)
libevent_pthreads-2.0.so.5 => /lib64/libevent_pthreads-2.0.so.5
(0x00007f6e89f87000)

Thanks very much,
Jianbo

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 6:01 PM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Glad you have it working. Thanks for the update.
>
> Satish
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Jianbo Long wrote:
>
> > Hi Satish and Barry,
> >
> > Thanks very much for the feedback !
> >
> > It looks like my include file path was not correct !
> >
> > Bests,
> > Jianbo
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 6:08 AM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > For ex83f.F90:
> > >
> > > >>>>>
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $ ls
> > > ex83f.F90
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $ ls
> > > ex83f.F90
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $ export PETSC_DIR=$HOME/petsc
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $ cp $PETSC_DIR/src/ksp/ksp/tests/makefile .
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $ make ex83f
> > > mpif90 -fPIC -Wall -ffree-line-length-none -ffree-line-length-0
> > > -Wno-lto-type-mismatch -Wno-unused-dummy-argument -g -O0
> > >  -I/home/balay/petsc/include
> > > -I/home/balay/petsc/arch-linux-c-debug/include     ex83f.F90
> > > -Wl,-rpath,/home/balay/petsc/arch-linux-c-debug/lib
> > > -L/home/balay/petsc/arch-linux-c-debug/lib
> > > -Wl,-rpath,/home/balay/soft/mpich-4.0.1/lib
> > > -L/home/balay/soft/mpich-4.0.1/lib
> > > -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12
> > > -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/12 -lpetsc -llapack -lblas -lm -lX11
> > > -lstdc++ -ldl -lmpifort -lmpi -lgfortran -lm -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s
> > > -lquadmath -lstdc++ -ldl -o ex83f
> > > balay at p1 /home/balay/test
> > > $
> > > <<<<<<
> > >
> > > Also when you are adding PETSc to your current project - are you using
> > > source files with .f or .f90 suffix? If so rename them to .F or .F90
> suffix.
> > >
> > > If you still have issues send more details - As Barry indicated - the
> > > makefile [with the sources compiled by this makefile] - and the
> compile log
> > > when you attempt to build these sources with this makefile.
> > >
> > > Satish
> > >
> > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Barry Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >  Please send your attempted makefile and we'll see if we can get it
> > > working.
> > > >
> > > >   I am not sure if we can organize the include files as Fortran
> compiler
> > > include files easily. We've always used the preprocessor approach. The
> > > Intel compiler docs indicate the procedure for finding the Fortran
> compiler
> > > include files
> > >
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/fortran-compiler-oneapi-dev-guide-and-reference/top/program-structure/use-include-files.html
> > > is the same as for the preprocessor include files so I don't
> understand how
> > > the using the Fortran compiler include file approach would make the
> > > makefiles any simpler for users?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   Barry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Nov 3, 2022, at 8:58 PM, Jianbo Long <longtuteng249 at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm struggling to make my FORTRAN code work with petsc as I cannot
> > > link the required header files (e.g., petscksp.h) and compiled library
> > > files to my FORTRAN code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Compiling petsc was not a problem. However, even with the fortran
> > > examples (see those on https://petsc.org/main/docs/manual/fortran/)
> and
> > > the guide on using petsc in c++ and fortran codes (see Section "Writing
> > > C/C++ or Fortran Applications" at
> > > https://petsc.org/main/docs/manual/getting_started/), I still cannot
> make
> > > my FORTRAN code work.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Fortran test code is exactly the example code ex83f.F90 (see
> > > attached files). Aftering following the 2nd method in the Guide (see
> the
> > > picture below), I still get errors:
> > > > >
> > > > > petsc/finclude/petscksp.h: No such file or directory
> > > > >
> > > > > Even if I set up the path of the header file correctly in my own
> > > makefile without using environment variables, I still can only find the
> > > file "petscksp.h" for my code. Of course, the trouble is that all other
> > > headers files required by KSP are recursively included in this
> petscksp.h
> > > file, and I have no way to link them together for my Fortran code.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, here are my questions:
> > > > > 1) in the Guide, how exactly are we supposed to set up the
> environment
> > > variables  PETSC_DIR  and PETSC_ARCH ? More details and examples would
> be
> > > extremely helpful !
> > > > > 2) Is there a way to get rid of the preprocessor statement
> > > > >  #include <petsc/finclude/petscvec.h>
> > > > > when using c++/Fortran codes ?
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, when using MUMPS package in a Fortran code, we can
> simply
> > > use compiler 'include', rather than a preprocessor, to extract all
> required
> > > variables for the user's codes :
> > > > >   INCLUDE 'zmumps_struc.h'
> > > > > where the header file zmumps_struc.h is already provided in the
> > > package. Similarly, I think it's much more portable and easier when
> using
> > > petsc in other codes if we can make it work to use petsc.
> > > > >
> > > > > (Note: similar issues were discussed before, see
> > >
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/htdig/petsc-users/2019-January/037499.html
> .
> > > Unfortunately, I have no clue about the solution archived there ...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts and solutions would be much appreciated !
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jianbo Long
> > > > >
> > > > > <image.png>
> > > > > <ex83f.F90>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20221107/237efc1e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: make.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 116528 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20221107/237efc1e/attachment-0001.bin>