[petsc-users] PETSc MUMPS interface
Zhang, Hong
hzhang at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Jan 17 11:18:08 CST 2022
Varun,
I am trying to find a way to enable you to switch options after MatLUFactorSymbolic(). A hack is modifying the flag 'mumps->matstruc' inside MatLUFactorSymbolic_AIJMUMPS() and MatFactorNumeric_MUMPS().
My understanding of what you want is:
// collect mumps memory info
...
MatLUFactorSymbolic(F,A,perm,iperm,&info);
printMumpsMemoryInfo(F);
//---------
if (memory is available) {
EPSSolve(eps); --> skip calling of MatLUFactorSymbolic()
} else {
//out-of-core (OOC) option in MUMPS
}
Am I correct? I'll let you know once I work out a solution.
Hong
________________________________
From: Varun Hiremath <varunhiremath at gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:10 PM
To: Zhang, Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov>
Cc: Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es>; Peder Jørgensgaard Olesen via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] PETSc MUMPS interface
Hi Jose, Hong,
Thanks for the explanation. I have verified using -log_view that MatLUFactorSymbolic is indeed getting called twice.
Hong, we use MUMPS solver for other things, and we typically run the symbolic analysis first and get memory estimates to ensure that we have enough memory available to run the case. If the available memory is not enough, we can stop or switch to the out-of-core (OOC) option in MUMPS. We wanted to do the same when using MUMPS via SLEPc/PETSc. Please let me know if there are other ways of getting these memory stats and switching options during runtime with PETSc.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks,
Varun
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 4:01 PM Zhang, Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:hzhang at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Varun,
I believe Jose is correct. You may verify it by running your code with option '-log_view', then check the number of calls to MatLUFactorSym.
I guess I can add a flag in PCSetUp() to check if user has already called MatLUFactorSymbolic() and wants to skip it. Normally, users simply allocate sufficient memory in the symbolic factorization. Why do you want to check it?
Hong
________________________________
From: Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es<mailto:jroman at dsic.upv.es>>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:11 AM
To: Varun Hiremath <varunhiremath at gmail.com<mailto:varunhiremath at gmail.com>>
Cc: Zhang, Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:hzhang at mcs.anl.gov>>; Peder Jørgensgaard Olesen via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>>
Subject: Re: [petsc-users] PETSc MUMPS interface
Hong may give a better answer, but if you look at PCSetUp_LU() https://petsc.org/main/src/ksp/pc/impls/factor/lu/lu.c.html#PCSetUp_LU you will see that MatLUFactorSymbolic() is called unconditionally during the first PCSetUp(). Currently there is no way to check if the user has already called MatLUFactorSymbolic().
Jose
> El 16 ene 2022, a las 10:40, Varun Hiremath <varunhiremath at gmail.com<mailto:varunhiremath at gmail.com>> escribió:
>
> Hi Hong,
>
> Thank you, this is very helpful!
>
> Using this method I am able to get the memory estimates before the actual solve, however, I think my code may be causing the symbolic factorization to be run twice. Attached is my code where I am using SLEPc to compute eigenvalues, and I use MUMPS for factorization. I have commented above the code that computes the memory estimates, could you please check and tell me if this would cause the symbolic factor to be computed twice (a second time inside EPSSolve?), as I am seeing a slight increase in the overall computation time?
>
> Regards,
> Varun
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:58 AM Zhang, Hong <hzhang at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:hzhang at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
> PCFactorSetMatSolverType(pc,MATSOLVERMUMPS);
> PCFactorSetUpMatSolverType(pc);
> PCFactorGetMatrix(pc,&F);
>
> MatLUFactorSymbolic(F,A,...)
> You must provide row and column permutations etc, petsc/src/mat/tests/ex125.c may give you a clue on how to get these inputs.
>
> Hong
>
>
> From: petsc-users <petsc-users-bounces at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users-bounces at mcs.anl.gov>> on behalf of Junchao Zhang <junchao.zhang at gmail.com<mailto:junchao.zhang at gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:03 AM
> To: Varun Hiremath <varunhiremath at gmail.com<mailto:varunhiremath at gmail.com>>
> Cc: Peder Jørgensgaard Olesen via petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>>
> Subject: Re: [petsc-users] PETSc MUMPS interface
>
> Calling PCSetUp() before KSPSetUp()?
>
> --Junchao Zhang
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:00 AM Varun Hiremath <varunhiremath at gmail.com<mailto:varunhiremath at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to collect MUMPS memory estimates based on the initial symbolic factorization analysis before the actual numerical factorization starts to check if the estimated memory requirements fit the available memory.
>
> I am following the steps from https://petsc.org/main/src/ksp/ksp/tutorials/ex52.c.html
>
> PCFactorSetMatSolverType(pc,MATSOLVERMUMPS);
> PCFactorSetUpMatSolverType(pc);
> PCFactorGetMatrix(pc,&F);
>
> KSPSetUp(ksp);
> MatMumpsGetInfog(F,...)
>
> But it appears KSPSetUp calls both symbolic and numerical factorization. So is there some other way to get these statistics before the actual factorization starts?
>
> Thanks,
> Varun
> <slepc_eps_mumps_test.cpp>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20220117/ff53d01e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list