[petsc-users] Nullspaces

Mon Jan 3 07:41:43 CST 2022

There could be a memory bug that does not cause a noticeable problem until
it hits some vital data and valgrind might find it on a small problem.

However you might have a bug like a hardwired buffer size that
overflows that is in fact not a bug until you get to this large size and in
that case valgrid would need to be run on the large case and would have a
good chance of finding it.

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 4:42 AM Marco Cisternino <marco.cisternino at optimad.it>
wrote:

> My comments are between the Mark’s lines and they starts with “#”
>
>
>
> Marco Cisternino
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov>
> *Sent:* sabato 25 dicembre 2021 14:59
> *To:* Marco Cisternino <marco.cisternino at optimad.it>
> *Cc:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>; petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Nullspaces
>
>
>
> If  "triggering the issue" requires a substantial mesh, that makes me
> think there is a logic bug somewhere. Maybe use valgrind.
>
>
>
> # Are you suggesting to use valgrind on this tiny toy code or on the
> original one? However, considering the purpose of the tiny code, i.e.
> testing the constant null space, why there should be a logical bug? Case 1
> passes and case 2 should be exactly the same, shouldn’t be it?
>
>
>
> Also you say you divide by the cell volume. Maybe I am not understanding
> this but that is basically diagonal scaling and that will change the null
> space (ie, not a constant anymore)
>
>
>
> # I agree on this, but it pushes a question: why the case 1 passes the
> test?
>
> # Thank you, Mark.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:11 AM Marco Cisternino <
> marco.cisternino at optimad.it> wrote:
>
> Hello Matthew,
>
> as promised I prepared a minimal (112960 rows. I’m not able to produce
> anything smaller than this and triggering the issue) example of the
> behavior I was talking about some days ago.
>
> What I did is to produce matrix, right hand side and initial solution of
> the linear system.
>
>
>
> As I told you before, this linear system is the discretization of the
> pressure equation of a predictor-corrector method for NS equations in the
> framework of finite volume method.
>
> This case has homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. Computational
> domain has two independent and separated sub-domains.
>
> I discretize the weak formulation and I divide every row of the linear
> system by the volume of the relative cell.
>
> The underlying mesh is not uniform, therefore cells have different
> volumes.
>
> The issue I’m going to explain does not show up if the mesh is uniform,
> same volume for all the cells.
>
>
>
> I usually build the null space sub-domain by sub-domain with
>
> MatNullSpaceCreate(getCommunicator(), PETSC_FALSE, nConstants, constants,
> &nullspace);
>
> Where nConstants = 2 and constants contains two normalized arrays with
> constant values on degrees of freedom relative to the associated sub-domain
> and zeros elsewhere.
>
>
>
> However, as a test I tried the constant over the whole domain using 2
> alternatives that should produce the same null space:
>
>    1. MatNullSpaceCreate(getCommunicator(), PETSC_TRUE, 0, nullptr,
>    &nullspace);
>    2. Vec* nsp;
>
> VecDuplicateVecs(solution, 1, &nsp);
>
> VecSet(nsp[0],1.0);
>
> VecNormalize(nsp[0], nullptr);
>
> MatNullSpaceCreate(getCommunicator(), PETSC_FALSE, 1, nsp, &nullspace);
>
>
>
> Once I created the null space I test it using:
>
> MatNullSpaceTest(nullspace, m_A, &isNullSpaceValid);
>
>
>
> The case 1 pass the test while case 2 don’t.
>
>
>
> I have a small code for matrix loading, null spaces creation and testing.
>
> Unfortunately I cannot implement a small code able to produce that linear
> system.
>
>
>
> As attachment you can find an archive containing the matrix, the initial
> solution (used to manually build the null space) and the rhs (not used in
> the test code) in binary format.
>
> You can also find the testing code in the same archive.
>
> I used petsc 3.12(gcc+openMPI) and petsc 3.15.2(intelOneAPI) same results.
>
> If the attachment is not delivered, I can share a link to it.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
>
> Marco Cisternino
>
>
>
>
>
> Marco Cisternino, PhD
> marco.cisternino at optimad.it
>
> ______________________
>
> Optimad Engineering Srl
>
> Via Bligny 5, Torino, Italia.
> +3901119719782
> www.optimad.it
>
>
>
> *From:* Marco Cisternino <marco.cisternino at optimad.it>
> *Sent:* martedì 7 dicembre 2021 19:36
> *To:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Nullspaces
>
>
>
> I will, as soon as possible...
>
>
>
> Scarica Outlook per Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 7, 2021 7:25:43 PM
> *To:* Marco Cisternino <marco.cisternino at optimad.it>
> *Cc:* petsc-users <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Nullspaces
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:19 AM Marco Cisternino <
> marco.cisternino at optimad.it> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> I’m still struggling with the Poisson equation with Neumann BCs.
>
> I discretize the equation by finite volume method and I divide every line
> of the linear system by the volume of the cell. I could avoid this
> division, but I’m trying to understand.
>
> My mesh is not uniform, i.e. cells have different volumes (it is an octree
> mesh).
>
> Moreover, in my computational domain there are 2 separated sub-domains.
>
> I build the null space and then I use MatNullSpaceTest to check it.
>
>
>
> If I do this:
>
> MatNullSpaceCreate(getCommunicator(), PETSC_TRUE, 0, nullptr, &nullspace);
>
> It works
>
>
>
> This produces the normalized constant vector.
>
>
>
> If I do this:
>
> Vec nsp;
>
> VecDuplicate(m_rhs, &nsp);
>
> VecSet(nsp,1.0);
>
> VecNormalize(nsp, nullptr);
>
> MatNullSpaceCreate(getCommunicator(), PETSC_FALSE, 1, &nsp, &nullspace);
>
> It does not work
>
>
>
> This is also the normalized constant vector.
>
>
>
> So you are saying that these two vectors give different results with
> MatNullSpaceTest()?
>
> Something must be wrong in the code. Can you send a minimal example of
> this? I will go
>
> through and debug it.
>
>
>
>   Thanks,
>
>
>
>      Matt
>
>
>
> Probably, I have wrong expectations, but should not it be the same?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Marco Cisternino, PhD
> marco.cisternino at optimad.it
>
> ______________________
>
> Optimad Engineering Srl
>
> Via Bligny 5, Torino, Italia.
> +3901119719782
> www.optimad.it
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20220103/0fe548c0/attachment.html>