[petsc-users] reproducibility

[Mark Adams]

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:33 AM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:16 AM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
>> How do you check out the version of PETSc used from the output:
>>
>> Using Petsc Development GIT revision: v3.15.0-531-g1397235  GIT Date:
>> 2021-05-18 13:47:28 -0400
>>
>> I am looking for a SHA1
>>
>
> You should be able to lookup the commit from the short hash
>
> git show 1397235
>
> but that hash is not in my repo.
>

Thanks everyone.

How would I get a version (a branch say) to be and stay visible?

I am not seeing any of my versions used for this data but they were all in
the repo at one point, in a branch. Does the branch need to be merged with
main?

I am going to rerun all the data anyway, so I now want to understand how to
set up a branch to use everywhere and, of course, stay visible (for a few
months at least).


>
>    Matt
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20210528/16fc22e2/attachment-0001.html>