[petsc-users] DMPlex tetrahedra facets orientation

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 09:11:01 CST 2021


On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 10:08 AM Isaac, Tobin G <tisaac at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:

> What Nicolas wants is pretty common in DG, and the quantity is available
> as just the cross product of the two vectors of the facet Jacobian.
> Computing it the way you suggest is kind of a backward reconstruction.
>

I do not quite understand. The facet Jacobian will not know what the
orientation with respect to the cell should be, and that is what he wants.

  Thanks,

    Matt


> Toby Isaac, Assistant Professor, GTCSE
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* petsc-users <petsc-users-bounces at mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of
> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 8, 2021, 09:56
> *To:* Nicolas Barral
> *Cc:* PETSc
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex tetrahedra facets orientation
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:02 AM Nicolas Barral <
> nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr> wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2021 22:56, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Nicolas Barral
>> > <nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> > <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >     On 07/03/2021 22:30, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> >      > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:13 PM Nicolas Barral
>> >      > <nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      > <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>> wrote:
>> >      >
>> >      >     On 07/03/2021 16:54, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> >      >      > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM Nicolas Barral
>> >      >      > <nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>
>> >      >      > <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>>> wrote:
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     Matt,
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     Thanks for your answer.
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     However, DMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM does not compute
>> >     what I
>> >      >     need
>> >      >      >     (normals of height 1 entities). I can't find any
>> >     function doing
>> >      >      >     that, is
>> >      >      >     there one ?
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      > The normal[] in DMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM() is exactly
>> what
>> >      >     you want.
>> >      >      > What does not look right to you?
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >     So it turns out it's not what I want because I need
>> >     non-normalized
>> >      >     normals. It doesn't seem like I can easily retrieve the norm,
>> >     can I?
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      > You just want area-weighted normals I think, which means that you
>> >     just
>> >      > multiply by the area,
>> >      > which comes back in the same function.
>> >      >
>> >
>> >     Ah by the area times 2, of course, my bad.
>> >     Do you order height-1 elements in a certain way ? I need to access
>> the
>> >     facet (resp. edge) opposite to a vertex in a tet (resp. triangle).
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes. Now that I have pretty much settled on it, I will put it in the
>> > manual. It is currently here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/blob/main/src/dm/impls/plex/plexinterpolate.c#L56
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.com%2Fpetsc%2Fpetsc%2F-%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fsrc%2Fdm%2Fimpls%2Fplex%2Fplexinterpolate.c%23L56&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599336310%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Ri17JMapieeD7CJm8BfQNLkQ0V00WG6IFgCLtsNNKbM%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>> > All normals are outward facing, but hopefully the ordering in the
>> sourse
>> > file makes sense.
>>
>> Thanks Matt, but I'm not sure I understand well. What I do so far is:
>>
>> ierr = DMPlexGetCone(dm, c, &cone);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>    for (i=0; i<dim+1; ++i) {
>>      f = cone[i];
>>      ierr = DMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM(dm, f, &area, NULL,
>> &vn[i*dim]);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>      if (dim == 3) { area *= 2; }
>>      for (j=0; j<dim; ++j) { vn[i*dim+j] *= area; }
>>
>> So in 3D, it seems that:
>> (vn[9],vn[10],vn[11]) is the inward normal to the facet opposing vertex0
>> (vn[6],vn[7],vn[8])             "                    "                 1
>> (vn[3],vn[4],vn[5])             "                    "                 2
>> (vn[0],vn[1],vn[2])             "                    "                 3
>>
>> in 2D:
>> (vn[2],vn[3]) is a normal to the edge opposing vertex 0
>> (vn[4],vn[5])          "                  "           1
>> (vn[0],vn[1])          "                  "           2
>> Yet in 2D, whether the normals are inward or outward does not seem
>> consistent across elements.
>>
>> What am I wrongly assuming ?
>>
>
> Ah, I see the problem. I probably need another function. You can tell that
> not many people use Plex this way yet.
> The logic for what you want is embedded my traversal, but it simple:
>
> ierr = DMPlexGetConeSize(dm, c, &coneSize);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMPlexGetCone(dm, c, &cone);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMPlexGetConeOrientation(dm, c, &ornt);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>    for (i=0; i<coneSize; ++i) {
>      f = cone[i];
>      flip = ornt[i] >= 0 ? 1 : -1;
>      ierr = DMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM(dm, f, &area, NULL,
> &vn[i*dim]);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>      if (dim == 3) { area *= 2; }
>      for (j=0; j<dim; ++j) { vn[i*dim+j] *= area * flip; }
>
> I could make a function that returns all normals, properly oriented. It
> would just do this.
>
>   Thanks,
>
>      Matt
>
> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas
>>
>> >
>> >    Thanks,
>> >
>> >      Matt
>> >
>> >     Thanks
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     Nicolas
>> >
>> >
>> >      >    Thanks,
>> >      >
>> >      >      Matt
>> >      >
>> >      >     If not, I'll fallback to computing them by hand for now. Is
>> the
>> >      >     following assumption safe or do I have to use
>> >     DMPlexGetOrientedFace?
>> >      >       >  if I call P0P1P2P3 a tet and note x the cross product,
>> >      >       >  P3P2xP3P1 is the outward normal to face P1P2P3
>> >      >       >  P0P2xP0P3              "                P0P2P3
>> >      >       >  P3P1xP3P0              "                P0P1P3
>> >      >       >  P0P1xP0P2              "                P0P1P2
>> >      >
>> >      >     Thanks
>> >      >
>> >      >     --
>> >      >     Nicolas
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >    Thanks,
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >      Matt
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     So far I've been doing it by hand, and after a lot of
>> >      >     experimenting the
>> >      >      >     past weeks, it seems that if I call P0P1P2P3 a
>> tetrahedron
>> >      >     and note x
>> >      >      >     the cross product,
>> >      >      >     P3P2xP3P1 is the outward normal to face P1P2P3
>> >      >      >     P0P2xP0P3              "                P0P2P3
>> >      >      >     P3P1xP3P0              "                P0P1P3
>> >      >      >     P0P1xP0P2              "                P0P1P2
>> >      >      >     Have I been lucky but can't expect it to be true ?
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     (Alternatively, there is a link between the normals
>> >     and the
>> >      >     element
>> >      >      >     Jacobian, but I don't know the formula and can  find
>> them)
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     Thanks,
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     --
>> >      >      >     Nicolas
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >     On 08/02/2021 15:19, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> >      >      >      > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:01 AM Nicolas Barral
>> >      >      >      > <nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>
>> >      >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>>
>> >      >      >      > <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>
>> >      >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>
>> >      >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr
>> >     <mailto:nicolas.barral at math.u-bordeaux.fr>>>>> wrote:
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >     Hi all,
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >     Can I make any assumption on the orientation of
>> >     triangular
>> >      >      >     facets in a
>> >      >      >      >     tetrahedral plex ? I need the inward facet
>> >     normals. Do
>> >      >     I need
>> >      >      >     to use
>> >      >      >      >     DMPlexGetOrientedFace or can I rely on either
>> >     the tet
>> >      >     vertices
>> >      >      >      >     ordering,
>> >      >      >      >     or the faces ordering ? Could
>> >      >     DMPlexGetRawFaces_Internal be
>> >      >      >     enough ?
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      > You can do it by hand, but you have to account for
>> >     the face
>> >      >      >     orientation
>> >      >      >      > relative to the cell. That is what
>> >      >      >      > DMPlexGetOrientedFace() does. I think it would be
>> >     easier
>> >      >     to use the
>> >      >      >      > function below.
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >     Alternatively, is there a function that
>> >     computes the
>> >      >     normals
>> >      >      >     - without
>> >      >      >      >     bringing out the big guns ?
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      > This will compute the normals
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >
>> >
>> https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/DMPLEX/DMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM.html
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcs.anl.gov%2Fpetsc%2Fpetsc-current%2Fdocs%2Fmanualpages%2FDMPLEX%2FDMPlexComputeCellGeometryFVM.html&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599346300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ut9h%2Bj4CWdc0JHHVCH1ZiM5ryR3M%2BJTEry2gfnSQuWI%3D&reserved=0>
>> >      >      >      > Should not be too heavy weight.
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >    THanks,
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >      Matt
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >     Thanks
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >     --
>> >      >      >      >     Nicolas
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      > --
>> >      >      >      > What most experimenters take for granted before
>> >     they begin
>> >      >     their
>> >      >      >      > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
>> >      >     results to which
>> >      >      >      > their experiments lead.
>> >      >      >      > -- Norbert Wiener
>> >      >      >      >
>> >      >      >      > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599346300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=K%2BiksJEah9OWRTKBmN5V%2BuhGcbpq7%2BcOGj7f4ROR%2Fu4%3D&reserved=0>
>> >      >      >     <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599356300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=auAm0U9Q7TWyqYSWAs8zSjbIAk20DycTMk5ICVKEVik%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      > --
>> >      >      > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin
>> >     their
>> >      >      > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
>> >     results to which
>> >      >      > their experiments lead.
>> >      >      > -- Norbert Wiener
>> >      >      >
>> >      >      > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599356300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ViZdydtMchq0A0ue%2FAaFBnvjo5ZGU37x7Q%2BPGG0%2F9pM%3D&reserved=0>
>> >      >     <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599366290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=JSvoNaYHiClCWi4my4TharBR4J5SgV82Dydvjpq9%2FDU%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      >
>> >      > --
>> >      > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> >      > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>> which
>> >      > their experiments lead.
>> >      > -- Norbert Wiener
>> >      >
>> >      > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599366290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=L%2FE8H2yjaHb0y2xexhjcz0CY9psrLdDNv1mmuuTCgcU%3D&reserved=0>
>> >     <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599376285%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SYp%2BRkQx8aVp%2BtJvvfzqSi8nnDvd9ezxh2kEtiRyLSY%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
>> > their experiments lead.
>> > -- Norbert Wiener
>> >
>> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599376285%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vwTodVxb3WpSg1SSgyQcBEzWq6PwOGfy1usuDAf%2FjZg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599376285%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=SYp%2BRkQx8aVp%2BtJvvfzqSi8nnDvd9ezxh2kEtiRyLSY%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.cse.buffalo.edu%2F~knepley%2F&data=04%7C01%7Ctisaac%40cc.gatech.edu%7Cfc7c2a129127412423eb08d8e2424867%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637508121599386283%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Za%2Fud4xn%2FTbDAWv3jtZJgGaRvp5PevATTO2XdkLISzw%3D&reserved=0>
>
>

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20210308/d1aa99ea/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list