[petsc-users] Detecting steady-state with TS

Mark Adams mfadams at lbl.gov
Fri Apr 30 21:52:19 CDT 2021


I'm not sure if (
https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TS2GetSolution.html)
would work but you just cache the norm of the solution or the whole
solution in the monitor method and declare convergence when the solution
does not change much.

There is probably a better way to do this but this is one way.

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:36 PM Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
salazardetro1 at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Thanks, can you elaborate on computing the time derived? TSMonitor only
> gives me the information at the current time step. I guess I could store a
> copy of the solution in the context so I can use it in the next call to
> compute the difference. On the other hand, I could also store the norm of
> the RHS function (since this is equal to the time derivative \frac{\partial
> \phi}{\partial t}).
>
>
>
> Miguel
>
>
>
> *From: *Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov>
> *Date: *Friday, April 30, 2021 at 3:56 PM
> *To: *"Salazar De Troya, Miguel" <salazardetro1 at llnl.gov>
> *Cc: *"Zhang, Hong via petsc-users" <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> *Subject: *Re: [petsc-users] Detecting steady-state with TS
>
>
>
> You could add a
> https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TSMonitorSet.html
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TSMonitorSet.html__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!hG6eR--4AkxoFHnPn3N8DJF2pPoVkaJT0f6vy9E2qTLMZ0TiqDR_kr5wbAbwapvuLtnSGw$>
> method, compute the time derived and decide how to declare converged.
>
>
>
> Then set converged (
> https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TSSetConvergedReason.html
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/TS/TSSetConvergedReason.html__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!hG6eR--4AkxoFHnPn3N8DJF2pPoVkaJT0f6vy9E2qTLMZ0TiqDR_kr5wbAbwaptYI8kTFA$>)
> with TS_CONVERGED_USER
>
>
>
> That should cause TS to wrap up the solve and exit cleanly.
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:27 PM Salazar De Troya, Miguel via petsc-users <
> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> I am solving the signed distance equation
>
>
>
> \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + sign (\phi_{0})(|\nabla \phi| - 1) = 0
>
>
>
> using a Local Discontinuous Galerkin (LDG) method as described in
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999110005255
> <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999110005255__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!hG6eR--4AkxoFHnPn3N8DJF2pPoVkaJT0f6vy9E2qTLMZ0TiqDR_kr5wbAbwapsr29KQOw$>
>
>
>
> I am interested in solving it close to steady state. I was hoping I could
> measure how close to steady state the solution is by using the
> TSSetEventHandler infrastructure, but the handler does not have information
> on the time derivative. I looked at TSPSEUDO, but it forces me to use an
> implicit method, which I cannot provide because how the LDG method works
> (it calculates the fluxes solving additional equations). This makes me
> wonder if the LDG method is the best choice, so I am open to suggestions.
>
>
>
> Given my current progress with the LDG approach, I am wondering if there
> is a way to solve to steady state using explicit algorithms such as
> Runge-Kutta.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Miguel
>
>
>
> Miguel A. Salazar de Troya
>
> Postdoctoral Researcher, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>
> B141
>
> Rm: 1085-5
>
> Ph: 1(925) 422-6411
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20210430/ba6be59c/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list