[petsc-users] Regarding Adding to ex11.c

[Mark Adams]

You want to make an MR (check to delete branch after merge and squash
commits), you can mark as WIP, run the pipeline and after you get it to run
clean and merge any comments, umark WIP. If it does not get merged in a few
days you could ask Satish.
Mark

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:12 PM MUKKUND SUNJII <mukkundsunjii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> Excellent! Does it suffice to ask for the merge request once I made the
> necessary additions to ex11.c?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mukkund
>
> On 30 Jun 2020, at 19:16, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:56 PM MUKKUND SUNJII <mukkundsunjii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am a master’s student in TU Delft, The Netherlands, and I am carrying
>> out my thesis using the adaptive mesh refinement solver provided in
>> ./ts/tutorials/ex11.c.
>>
>> In the process of my work, I have added a HLL Riemann Solver for the
>> shallow water equation. I had already tested and validated the Riemann
>> Solver using several cases (I am happy to provide a copy of my thesis
>> report). It would indeed be nice to see my work reflected in the current
>> version of ex11.c as an addition to its capability.
>>
>> Furthermore, I had also added a Riemann Solver that contains topography
>> terms and is well-balanced*. The caveat is that I see that there some
>> variations in the well-balancedness when choosing between p4est and Plex
>> DM’s. Perhaps, this could be looked at and fixed in the future.
>>
>> The purpose of this email is to propose the addition of the HLL Riemann
>> Solver for the shallow water equations to ex11.c and perhaps later explore
>> the possibility of adding the Riemann Solver with the bathymetry terms.
>>
>> I have already gone through the CI process instituted by PETSc
>> (previously integrated ./ts/tutorials/ex54.c into the repository with the
>> valuable assistance of Mr. Satish Balay). Hence, I would be more or less
>> familiar with the process.
>>
>> I kindly ask you provide any feedback on this proposition.
>>
>
> Yes, this sounds great to me.
>
>   Thanks,
>
>      Matt
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mukkund Sunjii
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20200630/53339ccf/attachment.html>