[petsc-users] Using "long int" variable in MatSetValues

Evan Um evanum at gmail.com
Wed Jun 3 01:09:18 CDT 2020


Hi Satish,

Thanks for your reply.
When the code is compiled using the petsc library built with the option, an
error message suggests that I need to use 'long long' rather than 'int'. I
can replace variable types with long long in my codes, but I am wondering
if there is any better way. If I replace 'int' with 'long long', it means
that I have to maintain two versions of PETSC application codes for small
and big problems.

Best,
Evan

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:47 PM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> You need PetscInt to be 64-bit-integer - so rebuild PETSc with the option:
> --with-64-bit-indices=1
>
> Satish
>
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Evan Um wrote:
>
> > Dear PETSC users,
> >
> > Using C++, I tried to build a very large sparse matrix and had a problem
> > shown below. Indices of the matrix should be "long int" rather than "int"
> > but PETSC does not allow this. How could I dodge this problem? Thanks for
> > your comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Evan
> >
> > fe.cpp(2009): error: argument of type "long *" is incompatible with
> > parameter of type "const PetscInt={int} *"
> >                 ierr=MatSetValues(Bseq, 1, &mat_b_i_partitioned[i], 1,
> > &mat_b_j_partitioned[i], &mat_b_val_partitioned[i], ADD_VALUES);
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20200602/12b64045/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list